» Articles » PMID: 32632486

Comparison of the Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Surgery Plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Jul 8
PMID 32632486
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are effective treatment options for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). We compared the short-term outcomes of surgery plus HIPEC and CRS alone for PC.

Methods: We retrospectively examined patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for PC at a single center from 2014 to 2019 using the Chinese CRS-HIPEC patient database at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups: surgery plus HIPEC (450) and surgery alone (200). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. The postoperative outcomes, mortality, and length of hospital stay were compared between the surgery plus HIPEC and CRS alone groups.

Results: Propensity scoring generated 162 pairs. There was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate between the groups (0% vs 0%, P = 1.000), and the morbidity rates were similar in both groups (7.4% vs 8.0%, P = 0.835). The surgery plus HIPEC group had a longer operative time (247.81 ± 64.70 vs 184.55 ± 29.56, P ≤ 0.001) and a slightly longer postoperative hospital stay (14.64 ± 5.24 vs 12.59 ± 3.76, P ≤ 0.001). No other baseline characteristics were significantly different.

Conclusions: Surgery plus HIPEC is feasible for select patients and is associated with prolonged surgery times and prolonged hospital stays, and there is no significant difference in mortality rates or postoperative outcomes.

References
1.
Glehen O, Osinsky D, Cotte E, Kwiatkowski F, Freyer G, Isaac S . Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia using a closed abdominal procedure and cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: morbidity and mortality analysis of 216 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10(8):863-9. DOI: 10.1245/aso.2003.01.018. View

2.
Sadeghi B, Arvieux C, Glehen O, Beaujard A, Rivoire M, Baulieux J . Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignancies: results of the EVOCAPE 1 multicentric prospective study. Cancer. 2000; 88(2):358-63. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000115)88:2<358::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-o. View

3.
de Cuba E, Kwakman R, Knol D, Bonjer H, Meijer G, te Velde E . Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal metastases combined with curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases: Systematic review of all literature and meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012; 39(4):321-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.11.003. View

4.
Cao C, Yan T, Black D, Morris D . A systematic review and meta-analysis of cytoreductive surgery with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16(8):2152-65. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0487-4. View

5.
Franko J, Shi Q, Goldman C, Pockaj B, Nelson G, Goldberg R . Treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis with systemic chemotherapy: a pooled analysis of north central cancer treatment group phase III trials N9741 and N9841. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 30(3):263-7. PMC: 3269953. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.1039. View