» Articles » PMID: 32631932

Maintenance Inhaler Therapy Preferences of Patients with Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Discrete Choice Experiment

Overview
Journal Thorax
Date 2020 Jul 8
PMID 32631932
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A variety of maintenance inhaler therapies are available to treat asthma and COPD. Patient-centric treatment choices require understanding patient preferences for the alternative therapies.

Methods: A self-completed web-based discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit patient preferences for inhaler device and medication attributes. Selection of attributes was informed by patient focus groups and literature review.

Results: The discrete choice experiment was completed by 810 patients with asthma and 1147 patients with COPD. Patients with asthma most valued decreasing the onset of action from 30 to 5 min, followed by reducing yearly exacerbations from 3 to 1. Patients with COPD most and equally valued decreasing the onset of action from 30 to 5 min and reducing yearly exacerbations from 3 to 1. Both patients with asthma and patients with COPD were willing to accept an additional exacerbation in exchange for a 15 min decrease in onset of action and a longer onset of action in exchange for a lower risk of adverse effects from inhaled corticosteroids. Patients with asthma and COPD valued once-daily over twice-daily dosing, pressurised inhalers over dry powder inhalers and non-capsule priming over single-use capsules, although these attributes were not valued as highly as faster onset of action or reduced exacerbations.

Conclusions: The most important maintenance inhaler attributes for patients with asthma and COPD were fast onset of symptom relief and a lower rate of exacerbations. Concerns about safety of inhaled corticosteroids and device convenience also affected patient preferences but were less important.

Citing Articles

Exploration of preferences among people with COPD to inform resource allocation: a discrete choice experiment study.

Ettinger J, Patel A, Ohrnberger J, Moore C, Bhudiya M, Smith W BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 39384337 PMC: 11474863. DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001914.


Treatment preferences in relation to fatigue of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A discrete choice experiment.

Tervonen T, Fox R, Brooks A, Sidorenko T, Boyanova N, Levitan B Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2023; 9(1):20552173221150370.

PMID: 36714174 PMC: 9880588. DOI: 10.1177/20552173221150370.


Suboptimal Control of Asthma Among Diverse Patients: A US Mixed Methods Focus Group Study.

George M, Balantac Z, Gillette C, Farooqui N, Tervonen T, Thomas C J Asthma Allergy. 2022; 15:1511-1526.

PMID: 36313858 PMC: 9601558. DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S377760.


The environmental impact of inhaled therapy: making informed treatment choices.

Woodcock A, Beeh K, Sagara H, Aumonier S, Addo-Yobo E, Khan J Eur Respir J. 2021; 60(1).

PMID: 34916263 PMC: 9301054. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02106-2021.


A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Collacott H, Zhang D, Heidenreich S, Tervonen T Patient. 2021; 15(1):55-68.

PMID: 34250574 PMC: 8738458. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00536-w.


References
1.
Tervonen T, Schmidt-Ott T, Marsh K, Bridges J, Quaife M, Janssen E . Assessing Rationality in Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: An Investigation into the Use of Dominance Tests. Value Health. 2018; 21(10):1192-1197. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1822. View

2.
Heiner M . Key barriers to optimal management of adult asthma in Australia: physician and patient perspectives. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007; 23(8):1799-807. DOI: 10.1185/030079907X210714. View

3.
Lancsar E, Louviere J . Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?. Health Econ. 2006; 15(8):797-811. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1104. View

4.
Chew L, Bradley K, Boyko E . Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med. 2004; 36(8):588-94. View

5.
Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Muhlbacher A, Regier D . Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013; 16(1):3-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223. View