» Articles » PMID: 32631861

Porcine and Bovine Forms of Lactoferrin Inhibit Growth of Porcine Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli and Degrade Its Virulence Factors

Overview
Date 2020 Jul 8
PMID 32631861
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Postweaning diarrhea (PWD) is an economically important, multifactorial disease affecting pigs within the first 2 weeks after weaning. The most common agent associated with PWD is enterotoxigenic (ETEC). Currently, antibiotics are used to control PWD, and this has most likely contributed to an increased prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains. This puts pressure on veterinarians and farmers to decrease or even abandon the use of antibiotics, but these measures need to be supported by alternative strategies for controlling these infections. Naturally derived molecules, such as lactoferrin, could be potential candidates due to their antibacterial or immune-modulating activities. Here, we analyzed the ability of bovine lactoferrin (bLF), porcine lactoferrin (pLF), and ovotransferrin (ovoTF) to inhibit ETEC growth, degrade ETEC virulence factors, and inhibit adherence of these pathogens to porcine intestinal epithelial cells. Our results revealed that bLF and pLF, but not ovoTF, inhibit the growth of ETEC. Furthermore, bLF and pLF can degrade several virulence factors produced by ETEC strains, more specifically F4 fimbriae, F18 fimbriae, and flagellin. On the other hand, ovoTF degrades F18 fimbriae and flagellin but not F4 fimbriae. An adhesion assay showed that bLF, ovoTF, and pLF can decrease the number of bacteria adherent to epithelial cells. Our findings demonstrate that lactoferrin can directly affect porcine ETEC strains, which could allow lactoferrin to serve as an alternative to antimicrobials for the prevention of ETEC infections in piglets. Currently, postweaning F4 and F18 infections in piglets are controlled by the use of antibiotics and zinc oxide, but the use of these antimicrobial agents most likely contributes to an increase in antibiotic resistance. Our work demonstrates that bovine and porcine lactoferrin can inhibit the growth of porcine enterotoxigenic strains. In addition, we also show that lactoferrin can reduce the adherence of these strains to small intestinal epithelial cells, even at a concentration that does not inhibit bacterial growth. This research could allow us to develop lactoferrin as an alternative strategy to prevent enterotoxigenic (ETEC) infections in piglets.

Citing Articles

Addressing the global challenge of bacterial drug resistance: insights, strategies, and future directions.

Karnwal A, Jassim A, Mohammed A, Al-Tawaha A, Selvaraj M, Malik T Front Microbiol. 2025; 16:1517772.

PMID: 40066274 PMC: 11891257. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1517772.


Lactoferrin: Properties and Potential Uses in the Food Industry.

Demir R, Saritas S, Bechelany M, Karav S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40003872 PMC: 11855648. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041404.


Lactoferrin impairs pathogen virulence through its proteolytic activity.

Ongena R, Dierick M, Vanrompay D, Cox E, Devriendt B Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1428156.

PMID: 39176399 PMC: 11339958. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1428156.


Production of a new tetravalent vaccine targeting fimbriae and enterotoxin of enterotoxigenic .

Xu C, She Y, Fu F, Xu C Can J Vet Res. 2024; 88(2):38-44.

PMID: 38595949 PMC: 11000427.


Exploring the modulatory role of bovine lactoferrin on the microbiome and the immune response in healthy and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli challenged weaned piglets.

Dierick M, Ongena R, Vanrompay D, Devriendt B, Cox E J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024; 15(1):39.

PMID: 38449023 PMC: 10916201. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-023-00985-3.


References
1.
Van den Broeck W, Cox E, Goddeeris B . Receptor-dependent immune responses in pigs after oral immunization with F4 fimbriae. Infect Immun. 1999; 67(2):520-6. PMC: 96350. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.2.520-526.1999. View

2.
Blais A, Fan C, Voisin T, Aattouri N, Dubarry M, Blachier F . Effects of lactoferrin on intestinal epithelial cell growth and differentiation: an in vivo and in vitro study. Biometals. 2014; 27(5):857-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10534-014-9779-7. View

3.
Sekse C, Bohlin J, Skjerve E, Vegarud G . Growth comparison of several Escherichia coli strains exposed to various concentrations of lactoferrin using linear spline regression. Microb Inform Exp. 2012; 2:5. PMC: 3432007. DOI: 10.1186/2042-5783-2-5. View

4.
Kawasaki Y, Tazume S, Shimizu K, Matsuzawa H, Dosako S, Isoda H . Inhibitory effects of bovine lactoferrin on the adherence of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to host cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000; 64(2):348-54. DOI: 10.1271/bbb.64.348. View

5.
Rhouma M, Fairbrother J, Beaudry F, Letellier A . Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies. Acta Vet Scand. 2017; 59(1):31. PMC: 5437690. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-017-0299-7. View