Which Preoperative Screening Tool Should Be Applied to Older Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery to Predict Short-term Postoperative Outcomes? Lessons from Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses and Guidelines

Overview

Journal Intern Emerg Med

Publisher Springer

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Medicine

Date 2020 Jul 3

PMID 32613471

Citations 5

Authors

Rachel Aitken

Nur-Shirin Harun

Andrea Britta Maier

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Older surgical patients have a higher risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity compared to younger patients. Timely identification of high-risk patients facilitates comprehensive preoperative evaluation, optimization, and resource allocation to help reduce this risk. This review aims to identify a preoperative screening tool for older patients undergoing elective surgery predictive of poor short-term postoperative outcomes.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted. An Ovid MEDLINE search was used to identify systematic reviews or meta-analyses comprising older elective patients in at least two different surgical settings. International guidelines were reviewed for recommendations regarding preoperative tools in this population.

Results: Over 50 screening tools were identified. The majority showed a positive association with short-term postoperative mortality and morbidity in older patients. The most commonly described tools were the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS), frailty tools and domain-specific tools administered as part of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Due to heterogeneity in outcome measures and statistical methodology the predictive capacity between tools could not be compared. International guidelines described a comprehensive preoperative approach incorporating domain-specific tools rather than recommending a screening tool.

Conclusion: Multiple tools were associated with poor short-term postoperative outcomes in older elective surgical patients. No single superior tool could be identified. Frailty, cognitive and/or functional tools were most frequently utilized.

Citing Articles

Identification of risk factors for postoperative complications after right colectomy and low anterior resection in patients ≥85 years old with colorectal cancer using the National Clinical Database.

Akagi T, Nishimura S, Ueda Y, Inomata M, Shiroshita H, Takiguchi S Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025; 9(2):329-338.

PMID: 40046531 PMC: 11877333. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12876.

Performance of the Nottingham hip fracture score (NHFS) as a predictor of 30-day mortality after proximal femur fracture in an older people Brazilian cohort.

Ferro F, Garcia Campos M, Picolli T, de Sa Mayoral V, Soares V, Ferreira J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5607.

PMID: 39955409 PMC: 11830071. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89869-2.

Preoperative Stress Testing before Non-Cardiac Surgery.

Dzhioeva O, Tadic M, Belyavskiy E Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(4):98.

PMID: 39076260 PMC: 11273002. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2404098.

Development of a minimum clinical dataset for preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment using a modified Delphi technique.

Lodge M, Aitken R, Chong Y, Thillainadesan J Australas J Ageing. 2024; 43(4):733-739.

PMID: 38754868 PMC: 11671713. DOI: 10.1111/ajag.13334.

Utility of the Age Discrepancy between Frailty-Based Biological Age and Expected Life Age in Patients with Urological Cancers.

Togashi K, Hatakeyama S, Soma O, Okita K, Fujita N, Tanaka T Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(24).

PMID: 36551713 PMC: 9776733. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246229.

References

Hamel M, Henderson W, Khuri S, Daley J . Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53(3):424-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53159.x. View

Scholz A, Oldroyd C, McCarthy K, Quinn T, Hewitt J . Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for postoperative delirium among older patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2015; 103(2):e21-8. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10062. View

Abdullahi Y, Athanasopoulos L, Casula R, Moscarelli M, Bagnall M, Ashrafian H . Systematic review on the predictive ability of frailty assessment measures in cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017; 24(4):619-624. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivw374. View

Ford M, Beattie W, Wijeysundera D . Systematic review: prediction of perioperative cardiac complications and mortality by the revised cardiac risk index. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152(1):26-35. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-1-201001050-00007. View

Huisman M, Kok M, de Bock G, van Leeuwen B . Delivering tailored surgery to older cancer patients: Preoperative geriatric assessment domains and screening tools - A systematic review of systematic reviews. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 43(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.003. View

Takahashi M, Takahashi M, Komine K, Yamada H, Kasahara Y, Chikamatsu S . The G8 screening tool enhances prognostic value to ECOG performance status in elderly cancer patients: A retrospective, single institutional study. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0179694. PMC: 5480957. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179694. View

Zhu Y, Wang G, Liu S, Zhou S, Lian Y, Zhang C . Risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing major head and neck cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017; 47(6):505-511. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx029. View

Eamer G, Al-Amoodi M, Holroyd-Leduc J, Rolfson D, Warkentin L, Khadaroo R . Review of risk assessment tools to predict morbidity and mortality in elderly surgical patients. Am J Surg. 2018; 216(3):585-594. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.04.006. View

Eamer G, Taheri A, Chen S, Daviduck Q, Chambers T, Shi X . Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older people admitted to a surgical service. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 1:CD012485. PMC: 6491328. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012485.pub2. View

10.

Partridge J, Harari D, Dhesi J . Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review. Age Ageing. 2012; 41(2):142-7. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afr182. View

11.

Partridge J, Sbai M, Dhesi J . Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018; 30(3):253-257. PMC: 5856875. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-017-0879-4. View

12.

Whittle A, Kalsi T, Babic-Illman G, Wang Y, Fields P, Ross P . A comprehensive geriatric assessment screening questionnaire (CGA-GOLD) for older people undergoing treatment for cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016; 26(5). DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12509. View

13.

Griffiths R, Beech F, Brown A, Dhesi J, Foo I, Goodall J . Peri-operative care of the elderly 2014: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2013; 69 Suppl 1:81-98. DOI: 10.1111/anae.12524. View

14.

Gordon A, Evans B, Dhesi J . The physician's role in perioperative management of older patients undergoing surgery. Clin Med (Lond). 2017; 17(4):357-359. PMC: 6297646. DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-4-357. View

15.

Visser A, Geboers B, Gouma D, Goslings J, Ubbink D . Predictors of surgical complications: A systematic review. Surgery. 2015; 158(1):58-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.012. View

16.

Buigues C, Juarros-Folgado P, Fernandez-Garrido J, Navarro-Martinez R, Cauli O . Frailty syndrome and pre-operative risk evaluation: A systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015; 61(3):309-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.08.002. View

17.

Mak P, Campbell R, Irwin M . The ASA Physical Status Classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002; 30(5):633-40. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0203000516. View

18.

Cesari M . Why and how do we measure frailty?. Intern Emerg Med. 2018; 14(1):5-6. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-018-1986-8. View

19.

Warnell I, Chincholkar M, Eccles M . Predicting perioperative mortality after oesophagectomy: a systematic review of performance and methods of multivariate models. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 114(1):32-43. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu294. View

20.

Fagard K, Leonard S, Deschodt M, Devriendt E, Wolthuis A, Prenen H . The impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in individuals aged 65 and over undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer: A systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol. 2016; 7(6):479-491. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.06.001. View