» Articles » PMID: 32612559

Moderators of Social Facilitation Effect in Virtual Reality: Co-presence and Realism of Virtual Agents

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2020 Jul 3
PMID 32612559
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social facilitation has been researched for decades, but in the face of the development of virtual reality technology, new questions arise regarding the possibility of its occurrence in this environment -in the presence of computer-generated agents. Past research provided inconclusive answers: several experiments confirmed this possibility, but several others disagreed. On the other hand, previous studies have shown the important role of VR characteristics, such as realism or co-presence, in evoking other psychological phenomena. However, no study has investigated the interplay between the presence of computer-generated agents and perceived social realism in evoking social facilitation in virtual reality. To this end, the present randomized control study was conducted. The sample consisted of professional firefighters ( = 48), divided into an experimental group with virtual bystanders and a control group without them. Subjects were instructed to perform a rescue procedure in a virtual reality headset. The performance of participants was logged and they completed questionnaires regarding sense of presence in the virtual environment, perceived realism of the environment and perceived co-presence of virtual agents. The obtained results confirmed the role of social realism as a moderator of the occurrence of social facilitation in the presence of computer-generated agents. At the same time, the main effect of facilitation was not confirmed. These results support predictions that the subjective feeling of being in a realistic company of others may be more important in evoking social facilitation than objective facts. Furthermore, the results contribute to the debate regarding the mechanism of social facilitation, suggesting that simple augmentation of the environment with social distractors is not always enough, thus questioning the attentional explanation of the effect. Taken together, our results extend previous findings on social facilitation and open up new possibilities for designing effective virtual environments.

Citing Articles

Social observation differentially affects prosocial learning of selfish and prosocial people.

Kim Y, Kim K, Kim H Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1440302.

PMID: 40012948 PMC: 11860963. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1440302.


Usability Evaluation of the Preoperative ISBAR (Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) Desktop Virtual Reality Application: Qualitative Observational Study.

Andreasen E, Hoigaard R, Berg H, Steinsbekk A, Haraldstad K JMIR Hum Factors. 2022; 9(4):e40400.

PMID: 36580357 PMC: 9837706. DOI: 10.2196/40400.


Copresence With Virtual Humans in Mixed Reality: The Impact of Contextual Responsiveness on Social Perceptions.

Pimentel D, Vinkers C Front Robot AI. 2021; 8:634520.

PMID: 33912595 PMC: 8072477. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.634520.

References
1.
Limentani G, Ringo M, Ye F, Berquist M, McSorley E . Beyond the t-test: statistical equivalence testing. Anal Chem. 2005; 77(11):221A-226A. DOI: 10.1021/ac053390m. View

2.
Pan X, F de C Hamilton A . Automatic imitation in a rich social context with virtual characters. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:790. PMC: 4460321. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00790. View

3.
Peirce J . Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy. Front Neuroinform. 2009; 2:10. PMC: 2636899. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008. View

4.
Poeschl S, Doering N . Measuring Co-Presence and Social Presence in Virtual Environments - Psychometric Construction of a German Scale for a Fear of Public Speaking Scenario. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016; 219:58-63. View

5.
Bond Jr C, Titus L . Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychol Bull. 1983; 94(2):265-92. View