» Articles » PMID: 32607424

The Psychological and Financial Impact of Long-distance Travel for Liver Transplantation

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Jul 2
PMID 32607424
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patients who travel long distances to undergo liver transplantation have limited opportunities to develop confidence in their new healthcare providers and experience fewer support visits from family and friends at the transplant site. The objectives of this study were to document the psychological and financial impact of having to travel long distances for liver transplantation in adult liver disease patients.

Methods: This was a single-center, prospective study that used a 7-question survey, including Likert scales, patient recall, and administrative databases.

Results: Ninety-six adult outpatient liver transplant recipients (59% males; mean age, 43.1 ± 2.1 y) participated in the survey. Approximately 70% (more so among males and higher educated patients) felt that they had sufficient time to develop confidence in their new healthcare providers and 87% felt that confidence in their local healthcare providers had not been diminished by undergoing the procedure elsewhere. Forty-four percent of patients felt that their overall liver transplant experience had been compromised by more limited opportunities for support visits, a perception that was twice as common in females. Median out-of-pocket expenses were under $5000, and inflation corrected costs to third-party payers have been stable for the past 20 y.

Conclusions: The principal psychological impact of travelling long distances for liver transplantation relates to the consequences of fewer support visits. Confidence in the new and local healthcare teams is not compromised by such travel in most patients. Out-of-pocket expenses are under $5000, and transplant costs to third-party payers have remained stable over the past 20 y.

Citing Articles

The financial burden after liver transplantation is significant among commercially insured adults: A large US National Cohort.

Lieber S, Jiang Y, Jones A, Gowda P, Ufere N, Patel M Liver Transpl. 2023; 30(9):932-944.

PMID: 38108824 PMC: 11182883. DOI: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000320.

References
1.
Bodzin A, Baker T . Liver Transplantation Today: Where We Are Now and Where We Are Going. Liver Transpl. 2018; 24(10):1470-1475. DOI: 10.1002/lt.25320. View

2.
van der Hilst C, IJtsma A, Slooff M, Tenvergert E . Cost of liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the United States with other OECD countries. Med Care Res Rev. 2008; 66(1):3-22. DOI: 10.1177/1077558708324299. View

3.
Weng F, Lee D, Dhillon N, Tibaldi K, Davis L, Patel A . Characteristics and Evaluation of Geographically Distant vs Geographically Nearby Living Kidney Donors. Transplant Proc. 2016; 48(6):1934-9. PMC: 5004771. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.042. View

4.
Kelly C, Hulme C, Farragher T, Clarke G . Are differences in travel time or distance to healthcare for adults in global north countries associated with an impact on health outcomes? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(11):e013059. PMC: 5178808. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013059. View

5.
Axelrod D, Dzebisashvili N, Schnitzler M, Salvalaggio P, Segev D, Gentry S . The interplay of socioeconomic status, distance to center, and interdonor service area travel on kidney transplant access and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 5(12):2276-88. PMC: 2994090. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04940610. View