» Articles » PMID: 32605230

A Combined Deep-Learning and Lattice Boltzmann Model for Segmentation of the Hippocampus in MRI

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2020 Jul 2
PMID 32605230
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Segmentation of the hippocampus (HC) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential step for diagnosis and monitoring of several clinical situations such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), schizophrenia and epilepsy. Automatic segmentation of HC structures is challenging due to their small volume, complex shape, low contrast and discontinuous boundaries. The active contour model (ACM) with a statistical shape prior is robust. However, it is difficult to build a shape prior that is general enough to cover all possible shapes of the HC and that suffers the problems of complicated registration of the shape prior and the target object and of low efficiency. In this paper, we propose a semi-automatic model that combines a deep belief network (DBN) and the lattice Boltzmann (LB) method for the segmentation of HC. The training process of DBN consists of unsupervised bottom-up training and supervised training of a top restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM). Given an input image, the trained DBN is utilized to infer the patient-specific shape prior of the HC. The specific shape prior is not only used to determine the initial contour, but is also introduced into the LB model as part of the external force to refine the segmentation. We used a subset of OASIS-1 as the training set and the preliminary release of EADC-ADNI as the testing set. The segmentation results of our method have good correlation and consistency with the manual segmentation results.

Citing Articles

An improved 3D-UNet-based brain hippocampus segmentation model based on MR images.

Yang Q, Wang C, Pan K, Xia B, Xie R, Shi J BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):166.

PMID: 38970025 PMC: 11225132. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01346-w.


Remote Sensing Monitoring of Grassland Locust Density Based on Machine Learning.

Du Q, Wang Z, Huang P, Zhai Y, Yang X, Ma S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(10).

PMID: 38793982 PMC: 11125102. DOI: 10.3390/s24103121.


Deep Learning-Based Intelligent Robot in Sentencing.

Chen X Front Psychol. 2022; 13:901796.

PMID: 35923731 PMC: 9341297. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901796.


Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease in the Current State: A Narrative Review.

Gunes S, Aizawa Y, Sugashi T, Sugimoto M, Rodrigues P Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(9).

PMID: 35563350 PMC: 9102515. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094962.


Research on Pathogenic Hippocampal Voxel Detection in Alzheimer's Disease Using Clustering Genetic Random Forest.

Liu W, Cao L, Luo H, Wang Y Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:861258.

PMID: 35463515 PMC: 9022175. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.861258.


References
1.
Avendi M, Kheradvar A, Jafarkhani H . A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI. Med Image Anal. 2016; 30:108-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.01.005. View

2.
Bron E, Smits M, van der Flier W, Vrenken H, Barkhof F, Scheltens P . Standardized evaluation of algorithms for computer-aided diagnosis of dementia based on structural MRI: the CADDementia challenge. Neuroimage. 2015; 111:562-79. PMC: 4943029. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.048. View

3.
Ngo T, Lu Z, Carneiro G . Combining deep learning and level set for the automated segmentation of the left ventricle of the heart from cardiac cine magnetic resonance. Med Image Anal. 2016; 35:159-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.05.009. View

4.
van der Lijn F, den Heijer T, Breteler M, Niessen W . Hippocampus segmentation in MR images using atlas registration, voxel classification, and graph cuts. Neuroimage. 2008; 43(4):708-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.058. View

5.
Zarpalas D, Gkontra P, Daras P, Maglaveras N . Accurate and Fully Automatic Hippocampus Segmentation Using Subject-Specific 3D Optimal Local Maps Into a Hybrid Active Contour Model. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2016; 2:1800116. PMC: 4852536. DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2014.2297953. View