» Articles » PMID: 32599257

A Multicenter Trial of a Shared DECision Support Intervention for Patients Offered Implantable Cardioverter-DEfibrillators: DECIDE-ICD Rationale, Design, Medicare Changes, and Pilot Data

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) facilitates delivery of medical therapies that are in alignment with patients' goals and values. Medicare national coverage decision for several interventions now includes SDM mandates, but few have been evaluated in nationwide studies. Based upon a detailed needs assessment with diverse stakeholders, we developed pamphlet and video patient decision aids (PtDAs) for implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) implantation, ICD replacement, and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillation to help patients contemplate, forecast, and deliberate their options. These PtDAs are the foundation of the Multicenter Trial of a Shared Decision Support Intervention for Patients Offered Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (DECIDE-ICD), a multicenter, randomized trial sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute aimed at understanding the effectiveness and implementation of an SDM support intervention for patients considering ICDs. Finalization of a Medicare coverage decision mandating the inclusion of SDM for new ICD implantation occurred shortly after trial initiation, raising novel practical and statistical considerations for evaluating study end points. METHODS/DESIGN: A stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial was designed, guided by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) planning and evaluation framework using an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type II design. Six electrophysiology programs from across the United States will participate. The primary effectiveness outcome is decision quality (defined by knowledge and values-treatment concordance). Patients with heart failure who are clinically eligible for an ICD are eligible for the study. Target enrollment is 900 participants. DISCUSSION: Study findings will provide a foundation for implementing decision support interventions, including PtDAs, with patients who have chronic progressive illness and are facing decisions involving invasive, preference-sensitive therapy options.

Citing Articles

Challenging the status quo: a scoping review of value-based care models in cardiology and electrophysiology.

Osoro L, Zylla M, Braunschweig F, Leyva F, Figueras J, Purerfellner H Europace. 2024; 26(9).

PMID: 39158601 PMC: 11393573. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae210.


Implementation of a Patient Decision Aid for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Improves Patient Procedural Knowledge but Does Not Impact Perceived Involvement With the Shared Decision-Making Process.

Sommers N, Rubenstein J, Ahmad A, Oujiri J, Kapoor R, Adsit G J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024; 11(2):74-80.

PMID: 39044856 PMC: 11262844. DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.2055.


Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Stacey D, Lewis K, Smith M, Carley M, Volk R, Douglas E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 1:CD001431.

PMID: 38284415 PMC: 10823577. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.


Patients' Perspectives Regarding Generator Exchanges of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.

Montembeau S, Merchant F, Speight C, Kramer D, Matlock D, Horny M Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023; 16(8):509-518.

PMID: 37492959 PMC: 10524607. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009827.


Navigating Cultural Diversity in the Selection of Cardiovascular Device Treatments: A Comprehensive Review.

Hasan M, Tabassum T, Tabassum T, Tanbir M, Kibria M, Chowduary M Cureus. 2023; 15(5):e38934.

PMID: 37313070 PMC: 10259755. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38934.


References
1.
Sepucha K, Levin C, Uzogara E, Barry M, OConnor A, Mulley A . Developing instruments to measure the quality of decisions: early results for a set of symptom-driven decisions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73(3):504-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.009. View

2.
Goldstein N, Carlson M, Livote E, Kutner J . Brief communication: Management of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in hospice: A nationwide survey. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152(5):296-9. PMC: 2832227. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-5-201003020-00007. View

3.
Glasgow R, Estabrooks P . Pragmatic Applications of RE-AIM for Health Care Initiatives in Community and Clinical Settings. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018; 15:E02. PMC: 5757385. DOI: 10.5888/pcd15.170271. View

4.
Mark D, Anstrom K, Sun J, Clapp-Channing N, Tsiatis A, Davidson-Ray L . Quality of life with defibrillator therapy or amiodarone in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(10):999-1008. PMC: 2823628. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706719. View

5.
Harden S, Smith M, Ory M, Smith-Ray R, Estabrooks P, Glasgow R . RE-AIM in Clinical, Community, and Corporate Settings: Perspectives, Strategies, and Recommendations to Enhance Public Health Impact. Front Public Health. 2018; 6:71. PMC: 5874302. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00071. View