» Articles » PMID: 32596293

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty and Debulking for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2020 Jun 30
PMID 32596293
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this article was to compare the efficiency and safety of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) and atherectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR). Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (all up to March 2019) were searched systematically. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted. 5 studies with 599 participants were included. Compared with PTA, DCB significantly increased the rate of patency (6 months: RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.09, < 0.01; 12 months: RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.30, < 0.01) and the rate freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) (6 months: RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.28, < 0.01; 12 months: RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.82, < 0.01) at 6 and 12 months follow-up, and the TSA results showed these outcomes were reliable. The rate of clinical improvement by ≥1 Rutherford category in the DCB group was higher than that in the PTA group (6 months: RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.75, = 0.03; 12 months: RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.82, < 0.01) at 6 and 12 months. There is no statistically difference of ABI, all-cause mortality, and incidence of amputation between DCB group and PTA group (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.08, = 0.40; RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.46 to 3.34, = 0.67; RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.61, = 0.48). Compared with PTA, the rate of patency and freedom from TLR in the laser atherectomy (LD) group was higher than that in the PTA group (patency: 6 months: RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.64, < 0.05, 12 months: RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.44, < 0.05; freedom from TLR: 6 months: RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.53, = 0.01, 12 months: RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.25, = 0.01) at 6 and 12 months follow-up. In conclusion, DCB and LD had superior clinical (freedom from TLR and clinical improvement) and angiographic outcomes (patency rate) compared with PTA for the treatment of femoropopliteal ISR. Moreover, DCB and LD had a low incidence of amputation and mortality and were relatively safe methods.

Citing Articles

Debulking plus drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-coated balloon angioplasty alone for femoropopliteal Tosaka III in-stent restenosis lesions.

Li L, Tong Z, Cui S, Guo L Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023; 18(1):166-172.

PMID: 37064559 PMC: 10091921. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.119936.


In-stent restenosis of superficial femoral artery: use all arrows in the quiver.

Vadala G, Ceresa F, Costa F, Bottari A, Roscitano G, Patane F Oxf Med Case Reports. 2022; 2022(10):omac108.

PMID: 36299675 PMC: 9589465. DOI: 10.1093/omcr/omac108.


The Diagnostic Value of Circulating Biomarkers and Role of Drug-Coated Balloons for In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Montelione N, Catanese V, Nenna A, Jawabra M, Verghi E, Loreni F Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36140608 PMC: 9498042. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092207.


Percutaneous Mechanical Atherectomy Plus Thrombectomy Using the Rotarex®S Device Followed by a Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-stent Restenosis: A Prospective Single-Center, Single-Arm Efficacy Trial (PERMIT-ISR....

Liu M, Li W, Guo X, Zhang Z, Liu B, Yu H Front Surg. 2021; 8:671849.

PMID: 34595204 PMC: 8477580. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.671849.

References
1.
Tosaka A, Soga Y, Iida O, Ishihara T, Hirano K, Suzuki K . Classification and clinical impact of restenosis after femoropopliteal stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 59(1):16-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036. View

2.
Dattilo R, Himmelstein S, Cuff R . The COMPLIANCE 360° Trial: a randomized, prospective, multicenter, pilot study comparing acute and long-term results of orbital atherectomy to balloon angioplasty for calcified femoropopliteal disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014; 26(8):355-60. View

3.
Kinstner C, Lammer J, Willfort-Ehringer A, Matzek W, Gschwandtner M, Javor D . Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty in In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Artery: 1-Year Results of the PACUBA Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(13):1386-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.012. View

4.
Byrne R, Neumann F, Mehilli J, Pinieck S, Wolff B, Tiroch K . Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet. 2012; 381(9865):461-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61964-3. View

5.
Ott I, Cassese S, Groha P, Steppich B, Voll F, Hadamitzky M . ISAR-PEBIS (Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for In-Stent Restenosis of Superficial Femoral Artery): A Randomized Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6(7). PMC: 5586321. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006321. View