» Articles » PMID: 32594871

Ritual and the Origins of First Impressions

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Jun 30
PMID 32594871
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When encountering a stranger for the first time, adults spontaneously attribute to them a wide variety of character traits based solely on their physical appearance, most notably from their face. While these trait inferences exert a pervasive influence over our behaviour, their origins remain unclear. Whereas nativist accounts hold that first impressions are a product of gene-based natural selection, the Trait Inference Mapping framework (TIM) posits that we learn face-trait mappings ontogenetically as a result of correlated face-trait experience. Here, we examine the available anthropological evidence on ritual in order to better understand the mechanism by which first impressions from faces are acquired. Consistent with the TIM framework, we argue that examination of ritual body modification performed by communities around the world demonstrates far greater cross-cultural variability in face-trait mappings than currently appreciated. Furthermore, rituals of this type may be a powerful mechanism through which face-trait associations are transmitted from one generation to the next. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ritual renaissance: new insights into the most human of behaviours'.

Citing Articles

Implicit bias and experience influence overall but not relative trustworthiness judgment of other-race faces.

Cheung O, Quimpo N, Smoley J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16068.

PMID: 38992163 PMC: 11239880. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66705-7.


I believe what I see: Impact of attire and academic degree on evaluation of personality traits of a politician.

Kaczmarek B, Stencel M Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2023; 10(4):311-320.

PMID: 38013734 PMC: 10535635. DOI: 10.5114/cipp.2021.110851.


The social learning and development of intra- and inter-ethnic sharing norms in the Congo Basin: A registered report protocol.

Pope-Caldwell S, Lew-Levy S, Maurits L, Boyette A, Ellis-Davies K, Haun D PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0276845.

PMID: 36378631 PMC: 9665382. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276845.


Preferential looking studies of trustworthiness detection confound structural and expressive cues to facial trustworthiness.

Eggleston A, Tsantani M, Over H, Cook R Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):17709.

PMID: 36271230 PMC: 9587250. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21586-6.


Why is the literature on first impressions so focused on White faces?.

Cook R, Over H R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8(9):211146.

PMID: 34567592 PMC: 8456137. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211146.


References
1.
Todorov A, Olivola C, Dotsch R, Mende-Siedlecki P . Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 66:519-45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831. View

2.
Over H, Cook R . Where do spontaneous first impressions of faces come from?. Cognition. 2017; 170:190-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.002. View

3.
Pinchi V, Barbieri P, Pradella F, Focardi M, Bartolini V, Norelli G . Dental Ritual Mutilations and Forensic Odontologist Practice: a Review of the Literature. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2016; 49(1):3-13. PMC: 4945341. DOI: 10.15644/asc49/1/1. View

4.
Degelman D, Price N . Tattoos and ratings of personal characteristics. Psychol Rep. 2002; 90(2):507-14. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.2.507. View

5.
Kapitany R, Nielsen M . Adopting the ritual stance: The role of opacity and context in ritual and everyday actions. Cognition. 2015; 145:13-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.002. View