ETView VivaSight Single Lumen Vs. Conventional Intubation in Simulated Studies: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal J Int Med Res

Publisher Sage Publications

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2020 Jun 27

PMID 32588689

Citations 3

Authors

Seok Kyeong Oh

Byung Gun Lim

Young Sung Kim

Jae Hak Lee

Young Ju Won

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The ETView VivaSight single lumen airway tube (ETView) is a tracheal tube incorporating a video camera. We carried out a meta-analysis of previous simulation studies by inexperienced personnel to determine if the ETView could improve the success rate of first-attempt intubation.

Methods: We collected data from randomized controlled trials comparing the use of the ETView VivaSight single lumen versus a conventional endotracheal tube in a simulated manikin or cadaver study.

Results: Eleven studies (558 participants, 3,254 intubations, and 19 scenarios) were included. The ETView had a significantly higher success rate and shorter insertion time than conventional intubation in both normal airways (with or without chest compression) and in difficult airways. In addition, the ETView demonstrated better results in terms of a higher rate of Cormack-Lehane grade 1 and a lower incidence of dental trauma.

Conclusions: Inexperienced personnel can insert the ETView more rapidly and with a higher intubation success rate compared with a conventional tube.

Citing Articles

Electronic visualized double-lumen endobronchial tube for situs inversus totalis: A case report and literature review.

Li Z, Wang Y, Liu Z, Luo N Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(48):e36295.

PMID: 38050294 PMC: 10695553. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036295.

ETView SL versus Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation Amid Simulated COVID-19 Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Evrin T, Dabkowski M, Pruc M, Hernik J, Wieczorek W, Chabowski L J Clin Med. 2023; 12(15).

PMID: 37568476 PMC: 10419956. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155074.

Development of endotracheal intubation devices for patients with tumors.

Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhu B, Xu W, Yang Y, Zou Z Am J Cancer Res. 2022; 12(6):2433-2446.

PMID: 35812038 PMC: 9251697.

References

Truszewski Z, Krajewski P, Fudalej M, Smereka J, Frass M, Robak O . A comparison of a traditional endotracheal tube versus ETView SL in endotracheal intubation during different emergency conditions: A randomized, crossover cadaver trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(44):e5170. PMC: 5591099. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005170. View

Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Baidya D . A comparison between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2018; 47:21-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.006. View

Li H, Zhang L, Yang Z, Huang Z, Chen B, Li Y . Even four minutes of poor quality of CPR compromises outcome in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013:171862. PMC: 3865628. DOI: 10.1155/2013/171862. View

Travers A, Rea T, Bobrow B, Edelson D, Berg R, Sayre M . Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S676-84. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970913. View

Mort T . Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004; 99(2):607-13, table of contents. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15. View

Saracoglu A, Saracoglu K . VivaSight: a new era in the evolution of tracheal tubes. J Clin Anesth. 2016; 33:442-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.034. View

Jiang J, Ma D, Li B, Yue Y, Xue F . Video laryngoscopy does not improve the intubation outcomes in emergency and critical patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2017; 21(1):288. PMC: 5702235. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1885-9. View

Maciejewski A, Nowicki M, Dabrowski M, Dabrowska A, Klosiewicz T . ETView® VivaSight SL as a novel method of endotracheal intubation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 35(11):1766. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.04.013. View

Elbourne D, Altman D, Higgins J, Curtin F, Worthington H, Vail A . Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol. 2002; 31(1):140-9. DOI: 10.1093/ije/31.1.140. View

10.

Pieters B, Maas E, Knape J, Van Zundert A . Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy use by experienced anaesthetists in patients with known difficult airways: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2017; 72(12):1532-1541. DOI: 10.1111/anae.14057. View

11.

Higgins J, Altman D, Gotzsche P, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman A . The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343:d5928. PMC: 3196245. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. View

12.

Madziala A, Cieciel M, Konski R, Madziala M . An endotracheal tube mounted camera for intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Preliminary data. Am J Emerg Med. 2018; 36(10):1897-1898. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.091. View

13.

Chloros T, Xanthos T, Iacovidou N, Bassiakou E . Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway achieves faster insertion times than Classic LMA during chest compressions in manikins. Am J Emerg Med. 2013; 32(2):156-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.10.048. View

14.

Langeron O, Birenbaum A, Amour J . Airway management in trauma. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009; 75(5):307-11. View

15.

Karczewska K, Szarpak L, Smereka J, Dabrowski M, Ladny J, Wieczorek W . ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017; 49(4):274-282. DOI: 10.5603/AIT.a2017.0047. View

16.

Ruetzler K, Roessler B, Potura L, Priemayr A, Robak O, Schuster E . Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices--a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2011; 82(5):593-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.008. View

17.

Nolan J . Prehospital and resuscitative airway care: should the gold standard be reassessed?. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002; 7(6):413-21. DOI: 10.1097/00075198-200112000-00008. View

18.

Stroumpoulis K, Isaia C, Bassiakou E, Pantazopoulos I, Troupis G, Mazarakis A . A comparison of the i-gel and classic LMA insertion in manikins by experienced and novice physicians. Eur J Emerg Med. 2011; 19(1):24-7. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3283474ab3. View

19.

Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, Smereka J, Evrin T, Czyzewski L . Are paramedics able to perform endotracheal intubation with access to the patient through the back seat of the car? Randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34(6):1161-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.062. View

20.

Kurowski A, Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, Czyzewski L . Can the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians?: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(21):e850. PMC: 4616410. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000850. View