» Articles » PMID: 32587921

Effect of Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Mouse Brain Morphological and Histopathological Profiling

Overview
Journal J Vet Res
Publisher Sciendo
Date 2020 Jun 27
PMID 32587921
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Mobile phones (MP) and other electronic and communication devices that are used daily expose users to electromagnetic fields (EMF) and contribute to an increasing incidence of neurological disorders. Brain tissue is the closest organ to the MP as it operates, thus the influence of MP radiation on brain tissue is of particular concern, although research is still inconclusive. The present study investigated the possible effect of an EMF (1,350-1,375 megahertz (MHz)) from an MP on morphological and histopathological profiles in the mouse brain.

Material And Methods: Healthy BALB/c mice were assigned to three equal groups (a control and two experimental groups, n = 10 each). Experimental mice were exposed to EMFs continuously for 72 h, those of experimental group I to a 1,350 MHz field at a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 4.0 W/kg, and group II to a 1,375 MHz field EMF at an SAR of 4.0 W/kg. Brain segmentation and histopathological analysis were applied to detect changes in the morphometric parameters of the brain lobes and identify pathological lesions, respectively.

Results: Histopathology results revealed shrinkage of pyramidal neurons, presence of mild perivascular and perineural oedema, and some vacuolation of neurons and glial cells derived from mouse great hemispheres. The lesions also included reduction of Purkinje cells, vacuolisation of neurons and glial cells, and interstitial oedema in the cerebellum.

Conclusion: MP distance of 3 cm from the cage may induce appreciable morphological changes in mouse brain structures; therefore, more comprehensive research is essential for assessment of safe distance. These pronounced effects may interfere with the results of laboratory tests on murine experimental models in veterinary or biomedical research.

Citing Articles

Investigation of the neuroprotective effect of crocin against electromagnetic field-induced cerebellar damage in male Balb/c mice.

Hajinejad M, Narouiepour A, Alipour F, Ebrahimzadeh Bideskan A Avicenna J Phytomed. 2024; 14(3):289-296.

PMID: 39086867 PMC: 11287030. DOI: 10.22038/AJP.2023.23005.


Pilot Study of the Long-Term Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure on the Mouse Brain.

Spandole-Dinu S, Catrina A, Voinea O, Andone A, Radu S, Haidoiu C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4).

PMID: 36833719 PMC: 9961585. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043025.


A Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Method Based on Quantum Entanglement and Wormhole Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization.

Zhang T, Zhang J, Xue T, Rashid M Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:794126.

PMID: 35620714 PMC: 9127532. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.794126.

References
1.
Singh S, Brocker C, Koppaka V, Chen Y, Jackson B, Matsumoto A . Aldehyde dehydrogenases in cellular responses to oxidative/electrophilic stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012; 56:89-101. PMC: 3631350. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.11.010. View

2.
Sengupta P . The Laboratory Rat: Relating Its Age With Human's. Int J Prev Med. 2013; 4(6):624-30. PMC: 3733029. View

3.
Kokturk S, Yardimoglu M, Celikozlu S, Gelenli Dolanbay E, Cimbiz A . Effect of extract on apoptosis in the rat cerebellum, following prenatal and postnatal exposure to an electromagnetic field. Exp Ther Med. 2013; 6(1):52-56. PMC: 3735912. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1123. View

4.
Antonovaite N, Beekmans S, Hol E, Wadman W, Iannuzzi D . Regional variations in stiffness in live mouse brain tissue determined by depth-controlled indentation mapping. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):12517. PMC: 6104037. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31035-y. View

5.
Lonn S, Ahlbom A, Hall P, Feychting M . Long-term mobile phone use and brain tumor risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 161(6):526-35. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi091. View