» Articles » PMID: 32585960

Multi-Step Ubiquitin Decoding Mechanism for Proteasomal Degradation

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2020 Jun 27
PMID 32585960
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The 26S proteasome is a 2.5-MDa protease complex responsible for the selective and ATP-dependent degradation of ubiquitylated proteins in eukaryotic cells. Proteasome-mediated protein degradation accounts for ~70% of all cellular proteolysis under basal conditions, and thereby any dysfunction can lead to drastic changes in cell homeostasis. A major function of ubiquitylation is to target proteins for proteasomal degradation. Accompanied by deciphering the structural diversity of ubiquitin chains with eight linkages and chain lengths, the ubiquitin code for proteasomal degradation has been expanding beyond the best-characterized Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains. Whereas polyubiquitylated proteins can be directly recognized by the proteasome, in several cases, these proteins need to be extracted or segregated by the conserved ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA)-family ATPase p97/valosin-containing protein (VCP) complex and escorted to the proteasome by ubiquitin-like (UBL)-ubiquitin associated (UBA) proteins; these are called substrate-shuttling factors. Furthermore, proteasomes are highly mobile and are appropriately spatiotemporally regulated in response to different cellular environments and stresses. In this review, we highlight an emerging key link between p97, shuttling factors, and proteasome for efficient proteasomal degradation. We also present evidence that proteasome-containing nuclear foci form by liquid-liquid phase separation under acute hyperosmotic stress.

Citing Articles

Occupancy of the HbYX hydrophobic pocket is sufficient to induce gate opening in the archaeal 20S proteasomes.

Chuah J, Daugherty M, Smith D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38826226 PMC: 11142061. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.21.595185.


New Scaffolds of Proteasome Inhibitors: Boosting Anticancer Potential by Exploiting the Synergy of In Silico and In Vitro Methodologies.

Guedes R, Grilo J, Carvalho A, Fernandes P, Ressurreicao A, Brito V Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(8).

PMID: 37631011 PMC: 10458307. DOI: 10.3390/ph16081096.


Current methodologies in protein ubiquitination characterization: from ubiquitinated protein to ubiquitin chain architecture.

Sun M, Zhang X Cell Biosci. 2022; 12(1):126.

PMID: 35962460 PMC: 9373315. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-022-00870-y.


Placental gene networks at the interface between maternal PM exposure early in gestation and reduced infant birthweight.

Deyssenroth M, Rosa M, Eliot M, Kelsey K, Kloog I, Schwartz J Environ Res. 2021; 199:111342.

PMID: 34015297 PMC: 8195860. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111342.

References
1.
Verma R, Oania R, Graumann J, Deshaies R . Multiubiquitin chain receptors define a layer of substrate selectivity in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell. 2004; 118(1):99-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.014. View

2.
Prakash S, Tian L, Ratliff K, Lehotzky R, Matouschek A . An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004; 11(9):830-7. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb814. View

3.
Raasi S, Varadan R, Fushman D, Pickart C . Diverse polyubiquitin interaction properties of ubiquitin-associated domains. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005; 12(8):708-14. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb962. View

4.
Yasuda S, Tsuchiya H, Kaiho A, Guo Q, Ikeuchi K, Endo A . Stress- and ubiquitylation-dependent phase separation of the proteasome. Nature. 2020; 578(7794):296-300. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-1982-9. View

5.
Ng J, Vrieling H, Sugasawa K, Ooms M, Grootegoed J, Vreeburg J . Developmental defects and male sterility in mice lacking the ubiquitin-like DNA repair gene mHR23B. Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 22(4):1233-45. PMC: 134644. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.4.1233-1245.2002. View