» Articles » PMID: 32585937

Attributable Risk to Assess the Health Impact of Air Pollution: Advances, Controversies, State of the Art and Future Needs

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Jun 27
PMID 32585937
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the increased attention given to the health impact assessment of air pollution and to the strategies to control it in both scientific literature and concrete interventions, the results of the implementations, especially those involving traffic, have not always been satisfactory and there is still disagreement about the most appropriate interventions and the methods to assess their effectiveness. This state-of-the-art article reviews the recent interpretation of the concepts that concern the impact assessment, and compares old and new measurements of attributable risk and attributable fraction. It also summarizes the ongoing discussion about the designs and methods for assessing the air pollution impact with particular attention to improvements due to spatio-temporal analysis and other new approaches, such as studying short term effects in cohorts, and the still discussed methods of predicting the values of attributable risk (AR). Finally, the study presents the more recent analytic perspectives and the methods for directly assessing the effects of not yet implemented interventions on air quality and health, in accordance with the suggestion in the strategic plan 2020-2025 from the Health Effect Institute.

Citing Articles

The potential impact of PM2.5 on the covid-19 crisis in the Brazilian Amazon region.

Goncalves K, Cirino G, Oliveira da Costa M, Couto L, Tortelote G, Hacon S Rev Saude Publica. 2023; 57:67.

PMID: 37878853 PMC: 10519675. DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005134.


How Do Inflammatory Mediators, Immune Response and Air Pollution Contribute to COVID-19 Disease Severity? A Lesson to Learn.

Signorini C, Pignatti P, Coccini T Life (Basel). 2021; 11(3).

PMID: 33669011 PMC: 7996623. DOI: 10.3390/life11030182.

References
1.
Savitz D . Commentary: Response to Environmental Pollution: More Research May Not Be Needed. Epidemiology. 2016; 27(6):919-20. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000526. View

2.
Hedley A, Wong C, Thach T, Ma S, Lam T, Anderson H . Cardiorespiratory and all-cause mortality after restrictions on sulphur content of fuel in Hong Kong: an intervention study. Lancet. 2002; 360(9346):1646-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11612-6. View

3.
Schwartz J, Austin E, Bind M, Zanobetti A, Koutrakis P . Estimating Causal Associations of Fine Particles With Daily Deaths in Boston. Am J Epidemiol. 2015; 182(7):644-50. PMC: 4692977. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwv101. View

4.
Roue-Le Gall A, Jabot F . Health impact assessment on urban development projects in France: finding pathways to fit practice to context. Glob Health Promot. 2017; 24(2):25-34. DOI: 10.1177/1757975916675577. View

5.
Morgenstern H, Bursic E . A method for using epidemiologic data to estimate the potential impact of an intervention on the health status of a target population. J Community Health. 1982; 7(4):292-309. DOI: 10.1007/BF01318961. View