» Articles » PMID: 32583325

Preoperative Nomogram Predicts Non-home Discharge in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2020 Jun 26
PMID 32583325
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, non-home discharge is common and often results in an unnecessary delay in hospital discharge. This study aimed to develop and validate a preoperative prediction model to identify patients with a high likelihood of non-home discharge following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods: Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy from 2013 to 2018 were identified using an institutional database. Patients were categorized according to discharge location (home vs. non-home). Preoperative risk factors, including social determinants of health associated with non-home discharge, were identified using Pearson's chi-squared test and then included in a multiple logistic regression model. A training cohort composed of 80% of the sampled patients was used to create the prediction model, and validation carried out using the remaining 20%. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results: Seven hundred sixty-six pancreatoduodenectomy patients met the study criteria for inclusion in the analysis (non-home, 126; home, 640). Independent predictors of non-home discharge on multivariable analysis were age, marital status, mental health diagnosis, functional health status, dyspnea, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The prediction model was then used to generate a nomogram to predict likelihood of non-home discharge. The training and validation cohorts demonstrated comparable performances with an identical area under the curve (0.81) and an accuracy of 84%.

Conclusion: A prediction model to reliably assess the likelihood of non-home discharge after pancreatoduodenectomy was developed and validated in the present study.

Citing Articles

Alternative discharge destination following lobectomy: Analysis of a national quality improvement database.

Yin V, Wightman S, Harano T, Atay S, Kim A JTCVS Open. 2024; 21:349-357.

PMID: 39534327 PMC: 11551280. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.06.020.

References
1.
Griffin J, Poruk K, Wolfgang C . Pancreatic cancer surgery: past, present, and future. Chin J Cancer Res. 2015; 27(4):332-48. PMC: 4560737. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.06.07. View

2.
Ryan C, Wood T, Ross S, Smart A, Sukharamwala P, Rosemurgy A . Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Florida: do 20-year trends document the salutary benefits of centralization of care?. HPB (Oxford). 2015; 17(9):832-8. PMC: 4557659. DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12467. View

3.
Rahib L, Smith B, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig A, Fleshman J, Matrisian L . Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014; 74(11):2913-21. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. View

4.
Cameron J, He J . Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 220(4):530-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.031. View

5.
Maatman T, Weber D, Timsina L, Qureshi B, Ceppa E, Nakeeb A . Antibiotic irrigation during pancreatoduodenectomy to prevent infection and pancreatic fistula: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Surgery. 2019; 166(4):469-475. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.053. View