» Articles » PMID: 32581315

Free-roaming Dogs Limit Habitat Use of Giant Pandas in Nature Reserves

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Jun 26
PMID 32581315
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) were historically hunted using dogs and are currently threatened by free-roaming dogs and their associated diseases. To better understand the spatial magnitude of this threat, we used a GIS approach to investigate edge effects of dogs on giant panda habitat. We first examined two nature reserves with contrasting free-roaming dog populations: Liziping, with many dogs (~0.44/km), and Daxiangling, with few dogs (~0.14/km). Spatial analysis indicated that giant pandas at Liziping (but not Daxiangling) showed a shift in habitat use away from populated areas consistent with a risk response to the foray distance of free-roaming dogs (10.9 km path-distance). Most giant panda locations (86%) from the 2014 census in Liziping were clustered around remote "dog-free zones." Expanding this analysis across the entire giant panda range revealed that 40% of panda habitat is within the foray distance of dogs. Our assessment will inform dog control programs including monitoring, education, veterinary care, and other measures. We recommend that reserves designated for the release of translocated pandas receive priority consideration for dog control efforts. Only by understanding and managing complex interactions between humans, domestic animals, and wild animals can we sustain natural systems in a world increasingly dominated by humans.

Citing Articles

Identifying Zoonotic Parasites in Domiciled and Non-Domiciled Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) Within an Urban Zone of the Eastern State of Mexico.

Salcedo-Jimenez J, Alcala-Canto Y, Segura-Tinoco J, Valadez-Moctezuma E, Perez-Rivero J Vet Med Sci. 2024; 10(6):e70059.

PMID: 39422096 PMC: 11487332. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.70059.


Challenges and Opportunities in Aligning Conservation with Development in China's National Parks: A Narrative Literature Review.

Rule A, Dill S, Sun G, Chen A, Khawaja S, Li I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(19).

PMID: 36232085 PMC: 9566203. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912778.


First detection and molecular identification of Babesia sp. from the giant panda, Ailuropoda melanoleuca, in China.

Yue C, Deng Z, Qi D, Li Y, Bi W, Ma R Parasit Vectors. 2020; 13(1):537.

PMID: 33121531 PMC: 7597363. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04412-8.

References
1.
Laurance W, Useche D, Rendeiro J, Kalka M, Bradshaw C, Sloan S . Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature. 2012; 489(7415):290-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature11318. View

2.
Lovejoy T . Protected areas: a prism for a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 21(6):329-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.005. View

3.
Laurance . Do edge effects occur over large spatial scales?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000; 15(4):134-135. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01838-3. View

4.
Fagan W, Cantrell R, Cosner C . How Habitat Edges Change Species Interactions. Am Nat. 2018; 153(2):165-182. DOI: 10.1086/303162. View

5.
Didham R, Tylianakis J, Gemmell N, Rand T, Ewers R . Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007; 22(9):489-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.001. View