» Articles » PMID: 32580983

Ecological Study of Playground Space and Physical Activity Among Primary School Children

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Jun 26
PMID 32580983
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To examine the relationship between school playground size and total physical activity (PA), fitness and fundamental movement skills (FMS) of primary school students.

Design: Cross-sectional ecological analysis.

Setting: 43 primary schools in New South Wales, Australia.

Participants: Data were from 5238 students, aged 5 to 12 years, participating in the Schools Physical Activity and Nutrition Survey.

Outcome Measures: Self (for age ≥11 years) and parent (for age <11 years) report of PA (meeting PA recommendations and number of days meeting recommendations), objectively measured FMS and cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness.

Results: Associations between playground space and measures of PA and fitness were mostly non-linear and moderated by loose equipment. Students in schools with no loose equipment showed a weak association between space and meeting PA recommendations (self-report). In schools with equipment, students' predicted probability of meeting PA recommendations increased sharply between 15 m and 25 m per student from 0.04 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.08) to 0.30 (95% CI: 0.14 to 0.46), but at 30 m returned to levels comparable to students in schools with no equipment (0.18, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.28). For cardiorespiratory fitness, in schools with no loose equipment, probabilities for being in the healthy cardiovascular fitness zone varied between 0.66 and 0.77, showing no consistent trend. Students in schools with loose equipment had a predicted probability of being in the healthy fitness zone of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.41 to 0.71) at 15 m per student, which rose to 0.75 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.86) at 20 m per student. There was no relationship between space and FMS.

Conclusions: School space guidelines need to incorporate sufficient playground space for students. Our study provides evidence supporting better PA outcomes with increasing space up to 25 m per student, and access to loose equipment, however further research is required to determine precise thresholds for minimum space. Intersectoral planning and cooperation is required to meet the needs of growing school populations.

Citing Articles

Characteristics of the Outdoor Environment Affording Physical Activity, Motor Competence, and Social Interactions in Children Aged 3-7 Years: A Systematic Review.

Taylor N, Pringle A, Roscoe C Children (Basel). 2025; 11(12.

PMID: 39767920 PMC: 11674526. DOI: 10.3390/children11121491.


The role of playgrounds in the development of children's fundamental movement skills: A scoping review.

Pawlowski C, Madsen C, Toftager M, Amholt T, Schipperijn J PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0294296.

PMID: 38091275 PMC: 10718446. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294296.


Associations between Amount of Recess, Physical Activity, and Cardiometabolic Traits in U.S. Children.

Clevenger K, Belcher B, Berrigan D Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2022; 7(3).

PMID: 36204452 PMC: 9531844. DOI: 10.1249/tjx.0000000000000202.


Evaluation of Social Impact Within Primary School Health Promotion: A Systematic Review.

Robertson D, Carins J, Rundle-Thiele S, Harris J J Sch Health. 2022; 92(8):739-764.

PMID: 35365879 PMC: 9544285. DOI: 10.1111/josh.13160.


Adaptive school grounds design in response to COVID-19: Findings from six primary schools in South East England.

Quinn A, Russo A Build Environ. 2022; 215:108946.

PMID: 35250152 PMC: 8881889. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108946.

References
1.
Gidlow C, Cochrane T, Davey R, Smith H . In-school and out-of-school physical activity in primary and secondary school children. J Sports Sci. 2008; 26(13):1411-9. DOI: 10.1080/02640410802277445. View

2.
Harten N, Olds T, Dollman J . The effects of gender, motor skills and play area on the free play activities of 8-11 year old school children. Health Place. 2007; 14(3):386-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.08.005. View

3.
Ridgers N, Salmon J, Parrish A, Stanley R, Okely A . Physical activity during school recess: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43(3):320-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.019. View

4.
DHaese S, Van Dyck D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G . Effectiveness and feasibility of lowering playground density during recess to promote physical activity and decrease sedentary time at primary school. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:1154. PMC: 3878886. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1154. View

5.
Steinbach R, Green J, Edwards P . Look who's walking: social and environmental correlates of children's walking in London. Health Place. 2012; 18(4):917-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.02.005. View