» Articles » PMID: 3257625

Prospective Comparative Study of Intermediate-field MR and CT in the Evaluation of Closed Head Trauma

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 1988 Mar 1
PMID 3257625
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Forty patients with closed head trauma were evaluated prospectively with CT and intermediate-field-strength MR imaging to compare the diagnostic efficacies of the two techniques. Traumatic lesions were detected in 38 patients. The severity of injury, as determined by the Glascow Coma Scale, ranged from 3 to 14. The sensitivities of CT and MR were calculated for all subgroups of lesions: (1) hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic intraaxial lesions (diffuse axonal injury, cortical contusion, subcortical gray-matter injury, primary brainstem injury); (2) extraaxial hematomas (subdural, epidural); and (3) diffuse hemorrhage (subarachnoid, intraventricular). CT and MR (T1- and T2-weighted) studies were both highly and comparably sensitive in the detection of hemorrhagic intraaxial lesions. MR scans, however, were much more sensitive in detecting nonhemorrhagic lesions. cortical contusions and diffuse axonal injury constituted 91.9% of all intraaxial lesions. The sensitivities of the imaging techniques for this combined group of lesions were (1) nonhemorrhagic lesions (CT = 17.7%, T1-weighted MR = 67.6%, T2-weighted MR = 93.3%); (2) hemorrhagic lesions (CT = 89.8%, T1-weighted MR = 87.1%, T2-weighted MR = 92.5%). MR was also significantly better in detecting brainstem lesions (CT = 9.1%, T1-weighted MR = 81.8%, T2-weighted MR = 72.7%). The sensitivities of the diagnostic studies in the detection of extraaxial hematomas were CT = 73.2%, T1-weighted MR = 97.6%, T2-weighted MR = 90.5%). Intraventricular hemorrhage was consistently seen with all three imaging studies, but subarachnoid hemorrhage was detected much more frequently with CT. In summary, MR has clear advantages over CT in evaluating closed head trauma. Although its sensitivity in detecting hemorrhagic lesions is similar to that of CT, it is much better than CT in detecting nonhemorrhagic lesions, which are more prevalent. MR is more useful than CT in classifying primary and secondary forms of injury and directing treatment. CT's one advantage over MR is its ability to more rapidly assess unstable patients who may need surgery.

Citing Articles

Recovery of consciousness after acute brain injury: a narrative review.

Egawa S, Ader J, Claassen J J Intensive Care. 2024; 12(1):37.

PMID: 39327599 PMC: 11425956. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-024-00749-9.


Chronic immunosuppression across 12 months and high ability of acute and subacute CNS-injury biomarker concentrations to identify individuals with complicated mTBI on acute CT and MRI.

Clarke G, Follestad T, Skandsen T, Zetterberg H, Vik A, Blennow K J Neuroinflammation. 2024; 21(1):109.

PMID: 38678300 PMC: 11056044. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-024-03094-8.


Association between mammillary body atrophy and memory impairment in retired athletes with a history of repetitive mild traumatic brain injury.

Miyata M, Takahata K, Sano Y, Yamamoto Y, Kurose S, Kubota M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7129.

PMID: 38531908 PMC: 10965940. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57383-6.


Improvement in Functional Outcome from 6 to 12 Months After Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Is Frequent, But May Not Be Detected With the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended.

Pantelatos R, Stenberg J, Follestad T, Sandrod O, Einarsen C, Vik A Neurotrauma Rep. 2024; 5(1):139-149.

PMID: 38435078 PMC: 10908320. DOI: 10.1089/neur.2023.0109.


Diffusion tensor imaging in the courtroom: Distinction between scientific specificity and legally admissible evidence.

van Velkinburgh J, Herbst M, Casper S World J Clin Cases. 2023; 11(19):4477-4497.

PMID: 37469746 PMC: 10353495. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4477.