» Articles » PMID: 32576219

Efficacy and Tolerability of the Investigational Topical Cream SD-101 (6% Allantoin) in Patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa: a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Trial (ESSENCE Study)

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Jun 25
PMID 32576219
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic disorder that manifests as blistering and/or skin erosion. There is no approved treatment for EB; current standard of care consists of wound and pain management. SD-101 6% is a topical cream containing 6% allantoin that was developed for treating skin lesions in patients with EB. The aim of this phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study was to assess the efficacy and safety of SD-101 6% cream versus vehicle (0% allantoin) on lesions in patients with EB.

Methods: Eligible patients were ≥1 month old, had a diagnosis of EB (simplex, recessive dystrophic, or intermediate junctional) and a target wound 10-50 cm in size that was present for ≥21 days. Patients were randomly assigned to SD-101 6% cream or vehicle, which was applied topically once a day to the entire body for 3 months. Primary efficacy endpoints were time to complete target wound closure within 3 months and the proportion of patients who experienced complete target wound closure within 3 months. Post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted by patient age and in those with body surface area index of total body wound burden ≥5% at baseline.

Results: In total, 169 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SD-101 6% (n = 82) or vehicle (n = 87). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between treatment groups. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in time to target wound closure (hazard ratio, 1.004; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.651, 1.549; P = 0.985) or proportion of patients with complete target wound closure within 3 months (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.733 [0.365, 1.474]; nominal P = 0.390). A positive trend toward faster wound closure with SD-101 6% versus vehicle was observed in patients aged 2 to <12 years and those with total body wound burden ≥5% at baseline. SD-101 6% cream was well tolerated.

Conclusions: SD-101 6% cream for treatment of EB-associated lesions was not more effective than vehicle in shortening the time to complete target wound closure or achieving complete target wound closure within 3 months.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02384460; Date of trial registration, February 13, 2015; First participant enrolled, March 11, 2015.

Citing Articles

Management of Skin Lesions in Patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa by Topical Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pabon-Carrasco M, Caceres-Matos R, Roche-Campos M, Hurtado-Guapo M, Ortiz-Romero M, Gordillo-Fernandez L Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(2).

PMID: 38275540 PMC: 11154251. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12020261.


ABCB5 mesenchymal stromal cells facilitate complete and durable wound closure in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

Dieter K, Niebergall-Roth E, Daniele C, Fluhr S, Frank N, Ganss C Cytotherapy. 2023; 25(7):782-788.

PMID: 36868990 PMC: 10257763. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.01.015.


A prospective short-term study to evaluate methodologies for the assessment of disease extent, impact, and wound evolution in patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

Paller A, Pope E, Rudin D, Malyala A, Ramsdell D, Johnson R Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022; 17(1):314.

PMID: 35964087 PMC: 9375287. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02461-z.


Wound closure in epidermolysis bullosa: data from the vehicle arm of the phase 3 ESSENCE Study.

Murrell D, Paller A, Bodemer C, Browning J, Nikolic M, Barth J Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020; 15(1):190.

PMID: 32693833 PMC: 7374851. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01435-3.

References
1.
Wally V, Kitzmueller S, Lagler F, Moder A, Hitzl W, Wolkersdorfer M . Topical diacerein for epidermolysis bullosa: a randomized controlled pilot study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013; 8:69. PMC: 3655927. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-69. View

2.
Uitto J, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Christiano A, McGrath J, Has C, South A . Progress toward Treatment and Cure of Epidermolysis Bullosa: Summary of the DEBRA International Research Symposium EB2015. J Invest Dermatol. 2016; 136(2):352-358. PMC: 4724642. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2015.10.050. View

3.
Eismann E, Lucky A, Cornwall R . Hand function and quality of life in children with epidermolysis bullosa. Pediatr Dermatol. 2013; 31(2):176-82. DOI: 10.1111/pde.12262. View

4.
Stern R, Lin A, Carter D . Lack of efficacy of phenytoin in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Epidermolysis Bullosa Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327(3):163-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199207163270305. View

5.
Jain S, Murrell D . Psychosocial impact of inherited and autoimmune blistering diseases. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018; 4(1):49-53. PMC: 5986115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.11.004. View