» Articles » PMID: 32574889

Considerations for Employing Intersectionality in Qualitative Health Research

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 2020 Jun 24
PMID 32574889
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intersectionality theory has recently emerged in the health sciences as a critical theoretical and methodical approach. Though some scholars have outlined explicit guidelines for applying intersectionality in research using quantitative methods, others have cited epistemological concerns and additive thinking to advocate for the analysis of intersectionality with qualitative methods. Thus, there remains a need for additional guidance and support for utilizing and applying intersectionality theory throughout the qualitative research process. With the goal of demystifying the process of utilizing intersectionality as a methodological approach in qualitative research in the health sciences, this paper provides researchers with recommendations, specific examples, and important considerations for incorporating intersectional approaches into study conceptualization, participant recruitment, data collection, and data analysis. Additionally, this paper reviews challenges that researchers may experience in conducting research using intersectional approaches and offers suggestions for overcoming challenges. This paper offers timely and relevant information that can be used to strengthen the theoretical and methodological rigor of qualitative health research, especially studies that seek to advance health equity.

Citing Articles

Experiences of menstrual health in the Nordic countries: a scoping review of qualitative research, applying an intersectional lens.

Akerman E, Wangborg A, Persson M, Klingberg-Allvin M Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025; 32(1):2446081.

PMID: 39950491 PMC: 11834814. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2446081.


Applying the Intersectionality Lens to Understand Minority Ethnic Women's Experiences of the Breast Cancer Care Pathway in England: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Estupinan Fdez de Mesa M, Ferguson M, Green S, Marcu A, Ream E, Whitaker K Psychooncology. 2025; 34(2):e70092.

PMID: 39915956 PMC: 11803129. DOI: 10.1002/pon.70092.


Studying gender in the experiences of patients with heart failure: A scoping review of qualitative studies and methodological recommendations.

Thomas E, Verdonk P, Roeters-van Lennep J, Rhodius-Meester H, Handoko L, Schoonmade L Womens Health (Lond). 2025; 21:17455057241305078.

PMID: 39883432 PMC: 11783506. DOI: 10.1177/17455057241305078.


Empowerment in prevention: a qualitative inquiry into Black girl-centred strategies for reducing HIV/STI and drug misuse risk.

Opara I, Asabor E, Rutledge J, Brooks Stephens J, Cayo S, Duran-Becerra B Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025; 32(1):2444728.

PMID: 39876818 PMC: 11884098. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2444728.


Autistic and transgender/gender diverse people's experiences of health and healthcare.

Green K, Weir E, Wright L, Allison C, Baron-Cohen S Mol Autism. 2025; 16(1):4.

PMID: 39833979 PMC: 11748291. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-024-00634-0.


References
1.
Henrich J, Heine S, Norenzayan A . The weirdest people in the world?. Behav Brain Sci. 2010; 33(2-3):61-83. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. View

2.
Sprague L, Afifi R, Ayala G, El-Nasoor M . Participatory praxis as an imperative for health-related stigma research. BMC Med. 2019; 17(1):32. PMC: 6376721. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1263-3. View

3.
Sue S . Science, ethnicity, and bias: where have we gone wrong?. Am Psychol. 2004; 54(12):1070-7. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.54.12.1070. View

4.
Asselin M . Insider research: issues to consider when doing qualitative research in your own setting. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2003; 19(2):99-103. DOI: 10.1097/00124645-200303000-00008. View

5.
Giordano J, OReilly M, Taylor H, Dogra N . Confidentiality and autonomy: the challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity. Qual Health Res. 2007; 17(2):264-75. DOI: 10.1177/1049732306297884. View