» Articles » PMID: 32566485

Evaluating the Impact of a School-Based Youth-Led Health Education Program for Adolescent Females in Mumbai, India

Overview
Journal Ann Glob Health
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Date 2020 Jun 23
PMID 32566485
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: India's 120 million adolescent girls often have limited opportunities to receive health education, as health-related content in school curricula can be minimal, and the few existing external interventions for this demographic rarely cover multiple topics.

Objectives: This study conducted a program evaluation of Girls Health Champions, a school-based peer education intervention in Mumbai, India that educates girls about leading causes of adolescent morbidity and mortality, including nutrition, mental health, and sexual & reproductive health.

Methods: Female participants ages 12 to 16 in the eighth, ninth, and tenth standards were recruited at five participating schools in Mumbai, India to learn a multi-topic health curriculum from their peers, with a subset of ninth standard participants in each school trained as the peer educators. Using a quasi-experimental design, participant survey data was collected three times during the 2016-2017 academic year: at baseline, immediately following the peer-led education sessions, and five months following these sessions. Outcomes of interest included change in knowledge levels and health attitudes following the intervention, as well as retention at mid-year. An additional outcome was the change in self-reported leadership skills of peer educators before and after participating.

Findings: Compared to baseline, participants demonstrated statistically significant increases in knowledge levels (+48%, p < 0.001) and positive shifts in health-related attitudes (+42%, p < 0.001). These changes were maintained at mid-year (+29% for knowledge levels, p < 0.001; +37% for attitudes, p < 0.001). Findings were consistent when data was stratified by standard and peer educator status (peer educators versus non-peer educators). Peer educators also demonstrated a statistically significant increase in their interest in health promotion.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the peer education delivery model and finds school-based, peer-led programs covering a range of adolescent health topics can significantly increase knowledge and shift attitudes of program participants. Such benefits can accrue to both peer educators and non-peer educator program participants.

Citing Articles

Socioecologies in shaping migrants and refugee youths' sexual and reproductive health and rights: a participatory action research study.

Aibangbee M, Micheal S, Liamputtong P, Pithavadian R, Hossain S, Mpofu E Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):134.

PMID: 39294779 PMC: 11409589. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01879-x.


How to make services adolescent friendly? A cross-sectional study on awareness of adolescent friendly health clinics in Central India.

Bali S, Chatterjee A, Nagi R, Gupta S, Singhal K J Family Med Prim Care. 2023; 11(10):6127-6134.

PMID: 36618224 PMC: 9810962. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_365_22.


School-based peer education interventions to improve health: a global systematic review of effectiveness.

Dodd S, Widnall E, Russell A, Curtin E, Simmonds R, Limmer M BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):2247.

PMID: 36461024 PMC: 9719233. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14688-3.


Perceived risk of harm from monthly cannabis use among US adolescents: National Survey on drug Use and Health, 2017.

Mariani A, Williams A Prev Med Rep. 2021; 23:101436.

PMID: 34168952 PMC: 8209744. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101436.


Adolescent access to health services in fragile and conflict-affected contexts: The case of the Gaza Strip.

Hamad B, Jones N, Gercama I Confl Health. 2021; 15(1):40.

PMID: 34020683 PMC: 8139118. DOI: 10.1186/s13031-021-00379-0.

References
1.
Chandra-Mouli V, Lane C, Wong S . What Does Not Work in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Review of Evidence on Interventions Commonly Accepted as Best Practices. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015; 3(3):333-40. PMC: 4570008. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00126. View

2.
Boyle J, Mattern C, Lassiter J, Ritzler J . Peer 2 peer: efficacy of a course-based peer education intervention to increase physical activity among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2011; 59(6):519-29. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2010.523854. View

3.
Tripathi N, Sekher T . Youth in India ready for sex education? Emerging evidence from national surveys. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e71584. PMC: 3739735. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071584. View

4.
Dasgupta A, Sarkar M . Menstrual Hygiene: How Hygienic is the Adolescent Girl?. Indian J Community Med. 2009; 33(2):77-80. PMC: 2784630. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.40872. View

5.
Balaji M, Andrews T, Andrew G, Patel V . The acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of a population-based intervention to promote youth health: an exploratory study in Goa, India. J Adolesc Health. 2011; 48(5):453-60. PMC: 4991743. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.029. View