» Articles » PMID: 32564030

Neonatal Umbilical Arterial Catheter Removal Is Accompanied by a Marked Decline in Phlebotomy Blood Loss

Overview
Journal Neonatology
Publisher Karger
Date 2020 Jun 22
PMID 32564030
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Umbilical arterial catheters (UACs) are frequently used in critically ill neonates. UAC are convenient, reliable, and allow for caregiver convenience in performing painless arterial blood sampling. We hypothesized that UAC removal in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates will result in significantly less phlebotomy blood loss (PBL) after correcting for severity of illness.

Study Design And Methods: PBL was measured at a single center in 99 ELBW infants who survived to day 28. Individual infant's paired daily PBL for the two 24-h periods before and after UAC removal were compared using the paired t test. Daily PBL up to 7 days before and 7 days after UAC removal were compared using a logistic regression with mixed model analysis for repeated measures. Cumulative 28-day phlebotomy loss was evaluated by multiple linear regression analysis.

Results: PBL 24 h before and after UAC removal were 1.7 mL (95% CI 1.5-1.9) and 0.9 mL (95% CI 0.8-1.0; p < 0.0001), respectively. Cumulative 28-day PBL increased by 2.2 mL (±0.7) per day that a UAC was present with or without correction for severity of illness (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: UAC removal is independently associated with a marked decline in PBL. We speculate the ease and convenience of UAC blood sampling lead to more frequent blood testing and greater PBL.

Citing Articles

Thresholds for blood transfusion in extremely preterm infants: A review of the latest evidence from two large clinical trials.

Meyer M, OConnor K, Meyer J Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:957585.

PMID: 36204671 PMC: 9530179. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.957585.


Iatrogenic Blood Loss in Very Low Birth Weight Infants and Transfusion of Packed Red Blood Cells in a Tertiary Care Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Aboalqez A, Deindl P, Ebenebe C, Singer D, Blohm M Children (Basel). 2021; 8(10).

PMID: 34682112 PMC: 8534821. DOI: 10.3390/children8100847.

References
1.
Obladen M, Sachsenweger M, Stahnke M . Blood sampling in very low birth weight infants receiving different levels of intensive care. Eur J Pediatr. 1988; 147(4):399-404. DOI: 10.1007/BF00496419. View

2.
Freise K, Widness J, Veng-Pedersen P . Erythropoietic response to endogenous erythropoietin in premature very low birth weight infants. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009; 332(1):229-37. PMC: 2802482. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.109.159905. View

3.
Lippi G, Fostini R, Guidi G . Quality improvement in laboratory medicine: extra-analytical issues. Clin Lab Med. 2008; 28(2):285-94, vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2007.12.007. View

4.
Valieva O, Strandjord T, Mayock D, Juul S . Effects of transfusions in extremely low birth weight infants: a retrospective study. J Pediatr. 2009; 155(3):331-37.e1. PMC: 3038786. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.02.026. View

5.
Rosebraugh M, Widness J, Nalbant D, Veng-Pedersen P . A mathematical modeling approach to quantify the role of phlebotomy losses and need for transfusions in neonatal anemia. Transfusion. 2012; 53(6):1353-60. PMC: 3546127. DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03908.x. View