» Articles » PMID: 32563654

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Computed Tomography and 18-F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Cardiac Masses

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography (CT) and F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in defining the nature of cardiac masses.

Background: The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac CT and F-FDG PET/CT in identifying the nature of cardiac masses has been analyzed to date only in small samples.

Methods: Of 223 patients with echocardiographically diagnosed cardiac masses, a cohort of 60 cases who underwent cardiac CT and F-FDG PET/CT was selected. All masses had histological confirmation, except for a minority of thrombotic formations. For each mass, 8 morphological CT signs, standardized uptake value (SUV, SUV), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis in F-FDG PET were used as diagnostic markers.

Results: Irregular tumor margins, pericardial effusion, invasion, solid nature, mass diameter, CT contrast uptake, and pre-contrast characteristics were strongly associated with the malignant nature of masses. The coexistence of at least 5 CT signs perfectly identified malignant masses, whereas the detection of 3 or 4 CT signs did not accurately discriminate the masses' nature. The mean SUV, SUV, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis values were significantly higher in malignant than in benign masses. The diagnostic accuracy of SUV, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis F-FDG PET/CT parameters was excellent in detecting malignant masses. Among patients with 3 or 4 pathological CT signs, the presence of at least 1 abnormal F-FDG PET/CT parameter significantly increased the identification of malignancies.

Conclusions: Cardiac CT is a powerful tool to diagnose cardiac masses as the number of abnormal signs was found to correlate with the lesions' nature. Similarly, F-FDG PET/CT accurately identified malignant masses and contributed with additional valuable information in diagnostic uncertainties after cardiac CT. These imaging tools should be performed in specific clinical settings such as involvement of great vessels or for disease-staging purposes.

Citing Articles

Cardiac computed tomography for cardiac masses: a necessity or a luxury?.

Joudar I, Nasri S, Kamaoui I, Skiker I J Int Med Res. 2025; 53(2):3000605241306604.

PMID: 39932298 PMC: 11815798. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241306604.


Cardiac Involvement in Metastatic Melanoma: Diagnostic Insights From Cardiac Imaging.

Fukui M JACC Case Rep. 2025; 30(1):102858.

PMID: 39822809 PMC: 11733537. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2024.102858.


Right Atrial Cardiac Hemangioma: A Multidisciplinary Pathway From Symptoms to Surgery.

Gourmelon J, Loobuyck V, Silvestri V, Chaput A, Altes A JACC Case Rep. 2025; 29(24):102920.

PMID: 39822611 PMC: 11734069. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2024.102920.


Multimodality Imaging in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Patients With Cardiac Masses: State-of-the-Art Review.

Angeli F, Bodega F, Bergamaschi L, Armillotta M, Amicone S, Canton L JACC CardioOncol. 2025; 6(6):847-862.

PMID: 39801632 PMC: 11711820. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.09.006.


Could Pulsed Wave Tissue Doppler Imaging Solve the Diagnostic Dilemma of Right Atrial Masses and Pseudomasses? A Case Series and Literature Review.

Sonaglioni A, Nicolosi G, Muti-Schunemann G, Lombardo M, Muti P J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797169 PMC: 11721131. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010086.