Usage, Definition, and Measurement of Coexistence, Tolerance and Acceptance in Wildlife Conservation Research in Africa

Overview

Journal Ambio

Date 2020 Jun 20

PMID 32557171

Citations 1

Authors

Jillian Knox

Kirstie Ruppert

Beatrice Frank

Carly C Sponarski

Jenny Anne Glikman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The terms 'coexistence', 'tolerance,' and 'acceptance' appear frequently in conservation literature, but lack consistent characterization, making them difficult to apply across intervention frameworks. This review aims to describe the common characterizations of these three terms using Africa-based research as a case study. Through systematic lexical searches, we identified 392 papers containing one or more of the three terms. We assessed their usage, definition, and measurement (or lack thereof) in wildlife conservation. Coexistence was used in 46% of papers, but was defined in only 2% and measured in 4%. Tolerance and acceptance were used in 63% and 61% of the papers in which they appeared, respectively, defined in 4% and 2%, and measured in 19% and 5%. These results confirm the lack of clear understanding of these concepts and evidence the need for a precise lexicon. This would allow conservationists to cohesively describe their work and increase replicability of research across contexts.

Citing Articles

Broadening the spectrum of conflict and coexistence: A case study example of human-wolf interactions in British Columbia, Canada.

Doney E, Frank B, Clark D PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318566.

PMID: 39919137 PMC: 11805382. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318566.

Beyond Tolerance: Mitigating Human-Wildlife Conflict with Hospitality.

Serenari C Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 38672332 PMC: 11047494. DOI: 10.3390/ani14081185.

References

Crespin S, Simonetti J . Reconciling farming and wild nature: Integrating human-wildlife coexistence into the land-sharing and land-sparing framework. Ambio. 2018; 48(2):131-138. PMC: 6346604. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-018-1059-2. View

Inskip C, Carter N, Riley S, Roberts T, Macmillan D . Toward Human-Carnivore Coexistence: Understanding Tolerance for Tigers in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0145913. PMC: 4712015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145913. View

Lindsey P, Havemann C, Lines R, Palazy L, Price A, Retief T . Determinants of persistence and tolerance of carnivores on Namibian ranches: implications for conservation on Southern African private lands. PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e52458. PMC: 3541385. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052458. View

Hill C, Webber A . Perceptions of nonhuman primates in human-wildlife conflict scenarios. Am J Primatol. 2010; 72(10):919-24. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20845. View

Ibbett H, Brittain S . Conservation publications and their provisions to protect research participants. Conserv Biol. 2019; 34(1):80-92. PMC: 7028057. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13337. View

Bennett N . Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol. 2016; 30(3):582-92. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12681. View

Dickman A, Macdonald E, Macdonald D . A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human-carnivore coexistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(34):13937-44. PMC: 3161573. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1012972108. View

Parathian H, McLennan M, Hill C, Frazao-Moreira A, Hockings K . Breaking Through Disciplinary Barriers: Human-Wildlife Interactions and Multispecies Ethnography. Int J Primatol. 2018; 39(5):749-775. PMC: 6267646. DOI: 10.1007/s10764-018-0027-9. View

Gabriel W, Luttbeg B, Sih A, Tollrian R . Environmental tolerance, heterogeneity, and the evolution of reversible plastic responses. Am Nat. 2005; 166(3):339-53. DOI: 10.1086/432558. View

10.

Haddaway N, Woodcock P, Macura B, Collins A . Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conserv Biol. 2015; 29(6):1596-605. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12541. View

11.

Crees J, Collins A, Stephenson P, Meredith H, Young R, Howe C . A comparative approach to assess drivers of success in mammalian conservation recovery programs. Conserv Biol. 2015; 30(4):694-705. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12652. View

12.

Salafsky N, Salzer D, Stattersfield A, Hilton-Taylor C, Neugarten R, Butchart S . A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation: unified classifications of threats and actions. Conserv Biol. 2008; 22(4):897-911. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00937.x. View

13.

Chapron G, Kaczensky P, Linnell J, von Arx M, Huber D, Andren H . Recovery of large carnivores in Europe's modern human-dominated landscapes. Science. 2014; 346(6216):1517-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1257553. View

14.

de Pinho J, Grilo C, Boone R, Galvin K, Snodgrass J . Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e88842. PMC: 3925186. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088842. View

15.

Harihar A, Chanchani P, Sharma R, Vattakaven J, Gubbi S, Pandav B . Conflating "co-occurrence" with "coexistence". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(2):E109. PMC: 3545792. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1217001110. View

16.

Treves A, Wallace R, White S . Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts. Conserv Biol. 2009; 23(6):1577-87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01242.x. View

17.

St John F, Keane A, Edwards-Jones G, Jones L, Yarnell R, Jones J . Identifying indicators of illegal behaviour: carnivore killing in human-managed landscapes. Proc Biol Sci. 2011; 279(1729):804-12. PMC: 3248731. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1228. View

18.

Carter N, Linnell J . Co-Adaptation Is Key to Coexisting with Large Carnivores. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016; 31(8):575-578. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.05.006. View

19.

Treves A, Bruskotter J . Ecology. Tolerance for predatory wildlife. Science. 2014; 344(6183):476-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1252690. View

20.

Eshete G, Tesfay G, Bauer H, Ashenafi Z, de Iongh H, Marino J . Community Resource Uses and Ethiopian Wolf Conservation in Mount Abune Yosef. Environ Manage. 2015; 56(3):684-94. PMC: 4527986. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0529-6. View