» Articles » PMID: 32555667

Treatment of Stimulant Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Reviews

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Jun 20
PMID 32555667
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Stimulant use disorder contributes to a substantial worldwide burden of disease, although evidence-based treatment options are limited. This systematic review of reviews aims to: (i) synthesize the available evidence on both psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for the treatment of stimulant use disorder; (ii) identify the most effective therapies to guide clinical practice, and (iii) highlight gaps for future study.

Methods: A systematic database search was conducted to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Eligible studies were those that followed standard systematic review methodology and assessed randomized controlled trials focused on the efficacy of interventions for stimulant use disorder. Articles were critically appraised using an assessment tool adapted from Palmeteer et al. and categorized for quality as 'core' or 'supplementary' reviews. Evidence from the included reviews were further synthesized according to pharmacological or non-pharmacological management themes.

Results: Of 476 identified records, 29 systematic reviews examining eleven intervention modalities were included. The interventions identified include: contingency management, cognitive behavioural therapy, acupuncture, antidepressants, dopamine agonists, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, disulfiram, opioid agonists, N-Acetylcysteine, and psychostimulants. There was sufficient evidence to support the efficacy of contingency management programs for treatment of stimulant use disorder. Psychostimulants, n-acetylcysteine, opioid agonist therapy, disulfiram and antidepressant pharmacological interventions were found to have insufficient evidence to support or discount their use. Results of this review do not support the use of all other treatment options.

Conclusions: The results of this review supports the use of contingency management interventions for the treatment of stimulant use disorder. Although evidence to date is insufficient to support the clinical use of psychostimulants, our results demonstrate potential for future research in this area. Given the urgent need for effective pharmacological treatments for stimulant use disorder, high-quality primary research focused on the role of psychostimulant medications for the treatment of stimulant use disorder is needed.

Citing Articles

Primary Care Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Safer Use Strategies for Opioids and/or Stimulants: A Mixed-Method Study.

Blanchard B, Austin E, Chase E, Rouvere J, Sharma V, Johnson M J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40038225 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09418-5.


Animal models of cocaine use: importance of social context and co-use.

Allen M, Nader M Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2025; 46(3):220-230.

PMID: 39875301 PMC: 11890930. DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2025.01.003.


Commentary on Qeadan et al.: Leveraging opportunities to expand the substance use disorder treatment arsenal.

Schepis T Addiction. 2024; 120(2):251-252.

PMID: 39657706 PMC: 11707304. DOI: 10.1111/add.16725.


Retention in primary care among unstably housed residents of a low-income, inner-city neighborhood with a high prevalence of substance use and related disorders.

Gumprich M, Zhang W, Li J, Salters K, Barrios R, Sereda P Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):256.

PMID: 39609880 PMC: 11606061. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02332-y.


Using the IFASIS (Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment) to Advance Context-Specific and Generalizable Knowledge of Implementation Determinants: Case Study of a Digital Contingency Management Platform.

Jakubowski A, Patrick B, DiClemente-Bosco K, Salino S, Scott K, Becker S Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39502779 PMC: 11537345. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4912858/v1.


References
1.
Perez-Mana C, Castells X, Vidal X, Casas M, Capella D . Efficacy of indirect dopamine agonists for psychostimulant dependence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010; 40(2):109-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.08.012. View

2.
Dursteler K, Berger E, Strasser J, Caflisch C, Mutschler J, Herdener M . Clinical potential of methylphenidate in the treatment of cocaine addiction: a review of the current evidence. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2015; 6:61-74. PMC: 4476488. DOI: 10.2147/SAR.S50807. View

3.
Alvarez Y, Farre M, Fonseca F, Torrens M . Anticonvulsant drugs in cocaine dependence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009; 38(1):66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.07.001. View

4.
Miller M, Aarde S, Moreno A, Creehan K, Janda K, Taffe M . Effects of active anti-methamphetamine vaccination on intravenous self-administration in rats. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015; 153:29-36. PMC: 4509945. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.014. View

5.
Oslin D, Pettinati H, Volpicelli J, Wolf A, Kampman K, OBrien C . The effects of naltrexone on alcohol and cocaine use in dually addicted patients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999; 16(2):163-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0740-5472(98)00039-7. View