» Articles » PMID: 32554662

Awareness and Use of Online Appointment Booking in General Practice: Analysis of GP Patient Survey Data

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Jun 20
PMID 32554662
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: General practices are required to provide online booking to patients in line with policy to digitise access. However, uptake of online booking by patients is currently low and there is little evidence about awareness and use by different patient groups.

Aim: To examine variability in awareness and use of online appointment booking in general practice.

Method: Secondary analysis of two questions from the GP Practice Survey data (2018) asking about awareness and use of online booking of appointments. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations with age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation, the presence of a long-term condition, long-term sickness and being deaf.

Results: In total, 43.3% (277 278/647 064) of responders reported being aware of being able to book appointments online, while only 15% (93 671/641 073) reported doing so. There was evidence of variation by all factors considered, with strong deprivation gradients in both awareness and use (for example, most versus least deprived quintile OR for use: 0.63 (95% CI = 0.61 to 0.65). There was a reduction in awareness and use in patients >75 years of age. Patients with long-term conditions were more aware and more likely to use online booking.

Conclusion: While over 40% of patients know that they can book appointment online, the number that actually do so is far lower. With the constant push for online services within the NHS and the roll out of the NHS app, practices should be aware that not all patient groups will book appointments online and that other routes of access need to be maintained to avoid widening health inequalities.

Citing Articles

Enhancing access to primary care is critical to the future of an equitable health service: using process visualisation to understand the impact of national policy in the UK.

Litchfield I, Gale N, Greenfield S, Shukla D, Burrows M Front Health Serv. 2025; 4:1499847.

PMID: 39931455 PMC: 11807964. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1499847.


Diverse roles of Primary Health Care in COVID-19 vaccination across 28 European countries - Insights from the Eurodata study.

Guisado-Clavero M, Gomez-Bravo R, Gefaell Larrondo I, Ramos Del Rio L, Fitzgerald L, Vinker S Eur J Gen Pract. 2024; 30(1):2409240.

PMID: 39435869 PMC: 11497572. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2409240.


The Use of Online Consultation Systems or Remote Consulting in England Characterized Through the Primary Care Health Records of 53 Million People in the OpenSAFELY Platform: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Fonseca M, Mackenna B, Mehrkar A, Walters C, Hickman G, Pearson J JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10():e46485.

PMID: 39292500 PMC: 11447420. DOI: 10.2196/46485.


What helps patients access web-based services in primary care? Free-text analysis of patient responses to the Di-Facto questionnaire.

Khan N, Pitchforth E, Winder R, Abel G, Clark C, Cockcroft E BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):20.

PMID: 38200431 PMC: 10777578. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02257-5.


Cross-sectional analyses of online appointment booking and repeat prescription ordering user characteristics in general practices of England in the years 2018-2020.

Alturkistani A, Greenfield G, Beaney T, Norton J, Costelloe C BMJ Open. 2023; 13(10):e068627.

PMID: 37827735 PMC: 10583059. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068627.