Individual Differences in Visualization and Childhood Play Preferences

Overview

Journal Heliyon

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2020 Jun 20

PMID 32551373

Authors

Olesya Blazhenkova

Robert W Booth

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Our research explored the structure of childhood visual play preferences, and examined different types of visual play in relation to individual differences in visualization and aptitudes in academic specializations requiring visualization skills. Principal component analysis dissociated visual-object play (e.g., exploring drawing media or decorative crafts) from visual-spatial play (e.g., assembling and disassembling mechanisms or playing with construction toys) preferences. Moreover, visual play preferences were dissociated from verbal play preferences (e.g., vocabulary games or making up stories). The structure of visual play preferences was consistent with object and spatial dimensions of individual differences in visualization. Visual-object and visual-spatial dimensions of play preferences were differentially related to measures of object visualization (processing pictorial appearances in terms of shape, texture, and color) versus spatial visualization (processing spatial relationships and spatial manipulations), as well as to aptitudes in artistic versus scientific domains. Furthermore, our research sheds new light on sex differences in play behavior: Previous studies commonly associated gender-specific play with visual versus verbal-social processing; our research demonstrated sex differences in play preferences across the two dimensions of visual play, where females preferred visual-object and males preferred visual-spatial play. Moreover, we found the object vs. spatial structure of visual play preferences was largely the same in both sexes, suggesting that differences in visual play preferences cannot be reduced to sex differences. Also, our questionnaire assessing visual-object, visual-spatial and verbal play preferences, developed for research purposes, demonstrated good reliability. Its two scales, assessing visual-object and visual-spatial play preferences, discriminatively correlated with assessments of individual differences in object and spatial visualization, respectively. This research creates a basis for further creation of comprehensive measures of visual play preferences, and should stimulate future studies examining visual play preferences and how they may create developmental opportunities for skills and preferences lasting into adulthood.

References

Baddeley A . Working memory. Science. 1992; 255(5044):556-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1736359. View

Rubin D, Schulkind M . The distribution of autobiographical memories across the lifespan. Mem Cognit. 1998; 25(6):859-66. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211330. View

Sallis J . Self-report measures of children's physical activity. J Sch Health. 1991; 61(5):215-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1991.tb06017.x. View

Kosslyn S, Ganis G, Thompson W . Neural foundations of imagery. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(9):635-42. DOI: 10.1038/35090055. View

Sherman J . Problem of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning. Psychol Rev. 1967; 74(4):290-9. DOI: 10.1037/h0024723. View

Miyake A, Friedman N, Rettinger D, Shah P, Hegarty M . How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002; 130(4):621-640. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.621. View

Alexander G, Wilcox T, Woods R . Sex differences in infants' visual interest in toys. Arch Sex Behav. 2008; 38(3):427-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-008-9430-1. View

Pruden S, Levine S . Parents' Spatial Language Mediates a Sex Difference in Preschoolers' Spatial-Language Use. Psychol Sci. 2017; 28(11):1583-1596. PMC: 5673527. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617711968. View

Brosnan M . Spatial ability in children's play with Lego blocks. Percept Mot Skills. 1998; 87(1):19-28. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.19. View

10.

Dominguez A, Ziviani J, Rodger S . Play behaviours and play object preferences of young children with autistic disorder in a clinical play environment. Autism. 2006; 10(1):53-69. DOI: 10.1177/1362361306062010. View

11.

ERIKSON E . Sex differences in the play configurations of preadolescents. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1951; 21(4):667-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1951.tb00021.x. View

12.

Hassett J, Siebert E, Wallen K . Sex differences in rhesus monkey toy preferences parallel those of children. Horm Behav. 2008; 54(3):359-64. PMC: 2583786. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.03.008. View

13.

Hollenberg C . Functions of visual imagery in the learning and concept formation of children. Child Dev. 1970; 41(4):1003-15. View

14.

Lillard A, Lerner M, Hopkins E, Dore R, Smith E, Palmquist C . The impact of pretend play on children's development: a review of the evidence. Psychol Bull. 2012; 139(1):1-34. DOI: 10.1037/a0029321. View

15.

Farah M, Hammond K, LeVine D, Calvanio R . Visual and spatial mental imagery: dissociable systems of representation. Cogn Psychol. 1988; 20(4):439-62. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90012-6. View

16.

LeVine D, Warach J, Farah M . Two visual systems in mental imagery: dissociation of "what" and "where" in imagery disorders due to bilateral posterior cerebral lesions. Neurology. 1985; 35(7):1010-8. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.35.7.1010. View

17.

McGee M . Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86(5):889-918. View

18.

YARROW M, Campbell J, BURTON R . Recollections of childhood. A study of the retrospective method. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1970; 35(5):1-83. View

19.

ROSENBERG B, SUTTON-SMITH B . A revised conception of masculine-feminine differences in play activities. J Genet Psychol. 1960; 96:165-70. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1960.10534287. View

20.

Wang J, Zhou T, Qiu M, Du A, Cai K, Wang Z . Relationship between ventral stream for object vision and dorsal stream for spatial vision: an fMRI + ERP study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000; 8(4):170-81. PMC: 6873314. View