» Articles » PMID: 32551100

Surgical Patients' Use Of, and Attitudes Towards, the Internet for E-patient Activities in Germany and Oman

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2020 Jun 20
PMID 32551100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: E-patient activities are known to impact upon the patient-doctor relationship and on surgical outcomes. In Oman, there is no published information about the e-patient. The aim of this study, conducted at two surgical sites, was to investigate surgical e-patients' use of, and attitudes towards, the Internet, and the possible impact on the delivery of healthcare.

Materials And Methods: A convenience sample of 83 German and 93 Omani patients at the two surgical sites were given an in-house paper-based questionnaire, based on e-patient activities described in the literature. Descriptive statistics like means, standard deviations and frequencies were calculated.

Results: There were many similarities in usage and attitudes. Omani patients showed much greater knowledge and usage of sites and apps, used the Internet more for health-related activities (26.9% vs. 12.0%), and had a greater proportion of their physician encounters through email (10.0% vs. 4.0%) and social media (15.2% vs. 1.8%). More Omani patients brought information from the Internet than German patients (13.5% vs. 6.0%). Patients from both countries were generally positive about bringing material from the Internet to the consultation.

Discussion And Conclusion: Both sites indicated typical e-patient activity and attitudes as described in the literature. Age and type of condition (chronic vs. acute) may explain the differences to some extent, but this was not consistent. Socio-cultural differences between the two countries may have a great influence on the usage.

References
1.
Diaz J, Griffith R, Ng J, Reinert S, Friedmann P, Moulton A . Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17(3):180-5. PMC: 1495021. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10603.x. View

2.
Stellefson M, Chaney B, Barry A, Chavarria E, Tennant B, Walsh-Childers K . Web 2.0 chronic disease self-management for older adults: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(2):e35. PMC: 3636299. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2439. View

3.
Fraval A, Chong Y, Holcdorf D, Plunkett V, Tran P . Internet use by orthopaedic outpatients - current trends and practices. Australas Med J. 2013; 5(12):633-8. PMC: 3561591. DOI: 10.4066/AMJ.2012.1530. View

4.
Masters K, Loda T, Johannink J, Al-Abri R, Herrmann-Werner A . Surgeons' Interactions With and Attitudes Toward E-Patients: Questionnaire Study in Germany and Oman. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(3):e14646. PMC: 7091032. DOI: 10.2196/14646. View

5.
Brandt C, Sogaard G, Clemensen J, Sndergaard J, Nielsen J . General Practitioners' Perspective on eHealth and Lifestyle Change: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6(4):e88. PMC: 5930171. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8988. View