» Articles » PMID: 32544182

Pre-existing Minor Variants with NS5A L31M/V-Y93H Double Substitution Are Closely Linked to Virologic Failure with Asunaprevir Plus Daclatasvir Treatment for Genotype 1b Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Abstract

Background: L31 and Y93 in the NS5A region of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most important substitution positions associated with resistance to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment.

Methods: We analyzed the frequency of NS5A L31M/V and Y93/H in NS5A inhibitor-naive HCV genotype 1 patients who received asunaprevir plus daclatasvir combination treatment using a conventional sequencing method and a deep sequencing method that can distinguish a single substitution at either position and a double substitution at both positions with a 0.1% detection threshold.

Results: The frequency of substitutions at both sites using the conventional method was very low, with 1 in 14 non-responders and 0 in 42 randomly selected responder patients. On the other hand, for the deep sequencing method, cases with double substitutions in the tandem sequence were detected in 8/14 non-responders and 1/42 responders (p<0.0001). For the conventional method, substitutions were detected at any position in 6/14 non-responders and 2/42 responders (p = 0.0019), with a clear difference between the two groups. The difference was also clear with the deep sequencing method, with 11/14 non-responders and 8/42 responders. Interestingly, for the deep sequencing method, the single substitution of L31 was found in 6/14 non-responders and 7/42 responders, whereas single substitutions of Y93 or double substitutions were found in 7/14 vs. 1/42 and 8/14 vs. 1/42 patients, respectively.

Conclusions: NS5A L31 and Y93 substitutions were detected in tandem by the deep sequencing methods in several genotype 1 patients, who may be more resistant to DAA treatment containing an NS5A inhibitor.

Citing Articles

Efficacy decrease of antiviral agents when administered to ongoing hepatitis C virus infections in cell culture.

Garcia-Crespo C, Vazquez-Sirvent L, Somovilla P, Soria M, Gallego I, de Avila A Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:960676.

PMID: 35992670 PMC: 9382109. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.960676.

References
1.
Kai Y, Hikita H, Morishita N, Murai K, Nakabori T, Iio S . Baseline quasispecies selection and novel mutations contribute to emerging resistance-associated substitutions in hepatitis C virus after direct-acting antiviral treatment. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:41660. PMC: 5278351. DOI: 10.1038/srep41660. View

2.
Suzuki Y, Ikeda K, Suzuki F, Toyota J, Karino Y, Chayama K . Dual oral therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir for patients with HCV genotype 1b infection and limited treatment options. J Hepatol. 2012; 58(4):655-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.09.037. View

3.
Kanda T, Lau G, Wei L, Moriyama M, Yu M, Chuang W . APASL clinical practice recommendation: how to treat HCV-infected patients with renal impairment?. Hepatol Int. 2018; 13(2):103-109. PMC: 6418053. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-018-9915-5. View

4.
Kinugasa H, Ikeda F, Takaguchi K, Mori C, Matsubara T, Shiraha H . Low frequency of drug-resistant virus did not affect the therapeutic efficacy in daclatasvir plus asunaprevir therapy in patients with chronic HCV genotype-1 infection. Antivir Ther. 2015; 21(1):37-44. DOI: 10.3851/IMP2976. View

5.
. 2017 KASL clinical practice guidelines management of hepatitis C: Treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2018; 24(3):169-229. PMC: 6166104. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2018.1004. View