» Articles » PMID: 32540229

Threshold for Computer- and Robot-Assisted Knee and Hip Replacements in the English National Health Service

Overview
Journal Value Health
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Jun 17
PMID 32540229
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To estimate threshold prices for computer- and robot-assisted knee and hip replacement.

Methods: A lifetime cohort Markov model provided the framework for analysis. Linked primary care and inpatient hospital records informed estimates of outcomes under current practice. Outcomes were estimated under a range of hypothetical relative improvements in quality of life if unrevised and in revision risk after computer or robot-assisted surgery. Threshold prices, a price at which the net health benefit from funding the intervention would be zero, for these improvements were estimated for a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000 per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

Results: For average patient profiles under current knee and hip replacement practice, lifetime QALYs were 10.3 (9.9 to 10.7) and 11.0 (10.6 to 11.4), with costs of £6060 (£5947 to £6203) and £6506 (£6335 to £6710) for knee and hip replacement, respectively. A combined 50% relative reduction in risk of revision and 5% improvement in postoperative quality of life if unrevised would, for example, result in QALYs increasing to 10.9 (10.4 to 11.3) and 11.6 (11.2 to 12.0), and costs falling to £5880 (£5816 to £5956) and £6258 (£6149 to £6376) after knee and hip replacement, respectively. These particular improvements would have an associated threshold price of £11 182 (£10 691 to £11 721) for knee replacement and £12 134 (£11 616 to £12 701) for hip replacement. The 50% reduction in revision rate alone would have associated threshold prices of £1094 (£788 to £1488) and £1347 (£961 to £1842), and the 5% improvement in quality of life alone would have associated threshold prices of £9911 (£9476 to £10 296) and £10 578 (£10 171 to £10 982).

Conclusions: At current prices, computer- and robot-assisted knee and hip replacement will likely need to lead to improvements in patient-reported outcomes in addition to any reduction in the risk revision.

Citing Articles

A systematic review on the cost-effectiveness of the computer-assisted orthopedic system.

Li H, Zhuang T, Wu W, Gan W, Wu C, Peng S Health Care Sci. 2024; 1(3):173-185.

PMID: 38938554 PMC: 11080830. DOI: 10.1002/hcs2.23.


Post-operative determinants of chronic pain after primary knee replacement surgery: Analysis of data on 258,386 patients from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR).

Khalid S, Mohammad H, Gooberman-Hill R, Garriga C, Pinedo-Villanueva R, Arden N Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022; 3(1):100139.

PMID: 36475073 PMC: 9718124. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100139.


Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and stressed hip-knee-ankle angle: equivalent methods for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Tarassoli P, Wood J, Chen D, Griffiths-Jones W, Bellemans J, MacDessi S Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(9):2980-2990.

PMID: 35819463 PMC: 9418303. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07038-8.


A Cost-Utility Analysis of Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: Using Robotic Data from the Private Sector and Manual Data from the National Health Service.

Clement N, Gaston P, Hamilton D, Bell A, Simpson P, Macpherson G Adv Orthop. 2022; 2022:5962260.

PMID: 35265378 PMC: 8898863. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5962260.


Advances and innovations in total hip arthroplasty.

Fontalis A, Epinette J, Thaler M, Zagra L, Khanduja V, Haddad F SICOT J. 2021; 7:26.

PMID: 33843582 PMC: 8040589. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2021025.