» Articles » PMID: 32537183

Management Evaluation of Metastasis in the Brain (MEMBRAIN)-a United Kingdom and Ireland Prospective, Multicenter Observational Study

Abstract

Background: In recent years an increasing number of patients with cerebral metastasis (CM) have been referred to the neuro-oncology multidisciplinary team (NMDT). Our aim was to obtain a national picture of CM referrals to assess referral volume and quality and factors affecting NMDT decision making.

Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study including all adult patients referred to NMDT with 1 or more CM was conducted. Data were collected in neurosurgical units from November 2017 to February 2018. Demographics, primary disease, KPS, imaging, and treatment recommendation were entered into an online database.

Results: A total of 1048 patients were analyzed from 24 neurosurgical units. Median age was 65 years (range, 21-93 years) with a median number of 3 referrals (range, 1-17 referrals) per NMDT. The most common primary malignancies were lung (36.5%, n = 383), breast (18.4%, n = 193), and melanoma (12.0%, n = 126). A total of 51.6% (n = 541) of the referrals were for a solitary metastasis and resulted in specialist intervention being offered in 67.5% (n = 365) of cases. A total of 38.2% (n = 186) of patients being referred with multiple CMs were offered specialist treatment. NMDT decision making was associated with number of CMs, age, KPS, primary disease status, and extent of extracranial disease (univariate logistic regression, < .001) as well as sentinel location and tumor histology ( < .05). A delay in reaching an NMDT decision was identified in 18.6% (n = 195) of cases.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates a changing landscape of metastasis management in the United Kingdom and Ireland, including a trend away from adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy and specialist intervention being offered to a significant proportion of patients with multiple CMs. Poor quality or incomplete referrals cause delay in NMDT decision making.

Citing Articles

Impact of multidisciplinary team on the pattern of care for brain metastasis from breast cancer.

Xu F, Ou D, Qi W, Wang S, Han Y, Cai G Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1160802.

PMID: 37664027 PMC: 10471195. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1160802.


The Role of the Immune Response in Brain Metastases: Novel Imaging Biomarkers for Immunotherapy.

Zakaria R, Radon M, Mills S, Mitchell D, Palmieri C, Chung C Front Oncol. 2021; 11:711405.

PMID: 34765539 PMC: 8577813. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.711405.


The Role of Stereotactic Biopsy in Brain Metastases.

Yu K, Patel A, Moss N Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2020; 31(4):515-526.

PMID: 32921348 PMC: 7490462. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2020.06.002.

References
1.
Venur V, Funchain P, Kotecha R, Chao S, Ahluwalia M . Changing Treatment Paradigms for Brain Metastases From Melanoma-Part 2: When and How to Use the New Systemic Agents. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017; 31(9):659-67. View

2.
Smith M, Lee J . Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastasis. Neurosurg Focus. 2007; 22(3):E5. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2007.22.3.6. View

3.
Loh D, Hogg F, Edwards P, MacColl J, Brogna C, Bhangoo R . Two-year experience of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) outcomes for brain metastases in a tertiary neuro-oncology centre. Br J Neurosurg. 2017; 32(1):53-60. DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2017.1368449. View

4.
Sperduto P, Kased N, Roberge D, Xu Z, Shanley R, Luo X . Effect of tumor subtype on survival and the graded prognostic assessment for patients with breast cancer and brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 82(5):2111-7. PMC: 3172400. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.027. View

5.
Malouff T, Bennion N, Verma V, Martinez G, Balkman N, Bhirud A . Which Prognostic Index Is Most Appropriate in the Setting of Delayed Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases?. Front Oncol. 2016; 6:248. PMC: 5116639. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00248. View