» Articles » PMID: 32529775

Recent Advances in Formulating and Processing Biomaterial Inks for Vat Polymerization-Based 3D Printing

Overview
Date 2020 Jun 13
PMID 32529775
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

3D printing and bioprinting have become a key component in precision medicine. They have been used toward the fabrication of medical devices with patient-specific shapes, production of engineered tissues for in vivo regeneration, and preparation of in vitro tissue models used for screening therapeutics. In particular, vat polymerization-based 3D (bio)printing as a unique strategy enables more sophisticated architectures to be rapidly built. This progress report aims to emphasize the recent advances made in vat polymerization-based 3D printing and bioprinting, including new biomaterial ink formulations and novel vat polymerization system designs. While some of these approaches have not been utilized toward the combination with biomaterial inks, it is anticipated their rapid translation into biomedical applications.

Citing Articles

Advancing Sustainability in Modern Polymer Processing: Strategies for Waste Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Integration.

Radu I, Vadureanu A, Cozorici D, Blanzeanu E, Zaharia C Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40006183 PMC: 11858819. DOI: 10.3390/polym17040522.


Extrusion bioprinting: meeting the promise of human tissue biofabrication?.

Holland I Prog Biomed Eng (Bristol). 2025; 7(2).

PMID: 39904058 PMC: 11894458. DOI: 10.1088/2516-1091/adb254.


Digital light processing printing of non-modified protein-only compositions.

Bunin A, Harari-Steinberg O, Kam D, Kuperman T, Friedman-Gohas M, Shalmon B Mater Today Bio. 2025; 30():101384.

PMID: 39790486 PMC: 11714671. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101384.


Leveraging printability and biocompatibility in materials for printing implantable vessel scaffolds.

Chen T, Jiang H, Zhang R, He F, Han N, Wang Z Mater Today Bio. 2024; 29:101366.

PMID: 39698000 PMC: 11652949. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101366.


Design considerations for digital light processing bioprinters.

Garciamendez-Mijares C, Aguilar F, Hernandez P, Kuang X, Gonzalez M, Ortiz V Appl Phys Rev. 2024; 11(3):031314.

PMID: 39221036 PMC: 11284760. DOI: 10.1063/5.0187558.


References
1.
Poldervaart M, Goversen B, de Ruijter M, Abbadessa A, Melchels F, Oner F . 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0177628. PMC: 5460858. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177628. View

2.
Huang X, Hou Y, Zhong L, Huang D, Qian H, Karperien M . Promoted Chondrogenesis of Cocultured Chondrocytes and Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Hypoxia Using In-situ Forming Degradable Hydrogel Scaffolds. Biomacromolecules. 2017; 19(1):94-102. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01271. View

3.
Bao G, Suresh S . Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials. Nat Mater. 2003; 2(11):715-25. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1001. View

4.
Grigoryan B, Paulsen S, Corbett D, Sazer D, Fortin C, Zaita A . Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels. Science. 2019; 364(6439):458-464. PMC: 7769170. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav9750. View

5.
Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, Zhang X, Zhong W, Xing M . 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater. 2018; 3(2):144-156. PMC: 5935777. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.008. View