» Articles » PMID: 32529377

Towards Control of Cellulose Biosynthesis by Komagataeibacter Using Systems-level and Strain Engineering Strategies: Current Progress and Perspectives

Overview
Date 2020 Jun 13
PMID 32529377
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The strains of the Komagataeibacter genus have been shown to be the most efficient bacterial nanocellulose producers. Although exploited for many decades, the studies of these species focused mainly on the optimisation of cellulose synthesis process through modification of culturing conditions in the industrially relevant settings. Molecular physiology of Komagataeibacter was poorly understood and only a few studies explored genetic engineering as a strategy for strain improvement. Only since recently the systemic information of the Komagataeibacter species has been accumulating in the form of omics datasets representing sequenced genomes, transcriptomes, proteomes and metabolomes. Genetic analyses of the mutants generated in the untargeted strain modification studies have drawn attention to other important proteins, beyond those of the core catalytic machinery of the cellulose synthase complex. Recently, modern molecular and synthetic biology tools have been developed which showed the potential for improving targeted strain engineering. Taking the advantage of the gathered knowledge should allow for better understanding of the genotype-phenotype relationship which is necessary for robust modelling of metabolism as well as selection and testing of new molecular engineering targets. In this review, we discuss the current progress in the area of Komagataeibacter systems biology and its impact on the research aimed at scaled-up cellulose synthesis as well as BNC functionalisation. Key points • The accumulated omics datasets advanced the systemic understanding of Komagataeibacter physiology at the molecular level. • Untargeted and targeted strain modification approaches have been applied to improve nanocellulose yield and properties. • The development of modern molecular and synthetic biology tools presents a potential for enhancing targeted strain engineering. • The accumulating omic information should improve modelling of Komagataeibacter's metabolism as well as selection and testing of new molecular engineering targets.

Citing Articles

CRISPR-guided base editor enables efficient and multiplex genome editing in bacterial cellulose-producing species.

Xin B, Liu J, Li J, Peng Z, Gan X, Zhang Y Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025; 91(2):e0245524.

PMID: 39887234 PMC: 11837512. DOI: 10.1128/aem.02455-24.


The microbiome analysis of ripen grape berries supports the complex etiology of sour rot.

Brischetto C, Rossi V, Fedele G Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1450443.

PMID: 39575185 PMC: 11578972. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1450443.


A Review on the Interaction of Acetic Acid Bacteria and Microbes in Food Fermentation: A Microbial Ecology Perspective.

Han D, Yang Y, Guo Z, Dai S, Jiang M, Zhu Y Foods. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200461 PMC: 11353490. DOI: 10.3390/foods13162534.


Directed evolution of material-producing microorganisms.

Laurent J, Jain A, Kan A, Steinacher M, Enrriquez Casimiro N, Stavrakis S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(31):e2403585121.

PMID: 39042685 PMC: 11295069. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2403585121.


Citrate-buffered Yamanaka medium allows to produce high-yield bacterial nanocellulose in static culture using strains isolated from apple cider vinegar.

Nunez D, Oyarzun P, Caceres R, Elgueta E, Gamboa M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1375984.

PMID: 38812914 PMC: 11133569. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1375984.


References
1.
Hu S, Gao Y, Tajima K, Sunagawa N, Zhou Y, Kawano S . Structure of bacterial cellulose synthase subunit D octamer with four inner passageways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(42):17957-61. PMC: 2964256. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000601107. View

2.
Setyawati M, Chien L, Lee C . Expressing Vitreoscilla hemoglobin in statically cultured Acetobacter xylinum with reduced O(2) tension maximizes bacterial cellulose pellicle production. J Biotechnol. 2007; 132(1):38-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.08.012. View

3.
Olsson C, Jansson H, Swenson J . The Role of Trehalose for the Stabilization of Proteins. J Phys Chem B. 2016; 120(20):4723-31. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b02517. View

4.
Sokollek S, Hertel C, Hammes W . Description of Acetobacter oboediens sp. nov. and Acetobacter pomorum sp. nov., two new species isolated from industrial vinegar fermentations. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998; 48 Pt 3:935-40. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-48-3-935. View

5.
Slapsak N, Cleenwerck I, de Vos P, Trcek J . Gluconacetobacter maltaceti sp. nov., a novel vinegar producing acetic acid bacterium. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013; 36(1):17-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2012.11.001. View