» Articles » PMID: 32529091

Psychological Predictors of the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicines During Pregnancy Within a Sample of Swiss Women

Overview
Date 2020 Jun 13
PMID 32529091
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Past works have witnessed increased prevalence of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) among women during pregnancy. This study aimed to identify psychological antecedents underlying CAM use through the exploration of various predictors. Drawing upon the literature on the use of CAM in contexts unrelated to pregnancy, this research explored the role of various predictors: perceived stress, beliefs about medicine, health locus of control (HLOC), health literacy, bullshit receptivity, and belief in conspiracy theories (CT). 376 Swiss women were recruited to complete a web-based questionnaire in which the use of different kinds of CAM was investigated. We performed hierarchical regression analyses with backward method to assess the overall variance explained by the predictors, as well as their unique contributions. We measured the number of CAM used during last pregnancy and frequency of use. Analyses showed that CAM use was positively associated with perceived stress, beliefs about medicine, internal HLOC, and belief in CT. In contrast, negative relationships were found with external HLOC, bullshit receptivity, and health literacy. By illuminating such factors, this research contributed to explaining why women may be tempted to choose CAM in place of conventional medicine, which may be of particular interest for health professionals in the planning of communication strategies aimed at limiting risks associated to their use during pregnancy.

Citing Articles

The Relationship between Bullshit Receptivity and Willingness to Share Misinformation about Climate Change: The Moderating Role of Pregnancy.

Lai K, Yang Y, Na Y, Wang H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(24).

PMID: 36554551 PMC: 9779392. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416670.


Health literacy in dietary supplement use among working-age groups: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intarakamhang U, Prasittichok P Heliyon. 2022; 8(8):e10320.

PMID: 35991992 PMC: 9384266. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10320.

References
1.
Chung S, Yeh T, Wu C . Trend and pattern of herb and supplement use among pregnant women in the United States: findings from the 2002, 2007, and 2012 US National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 216(2):189-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1019. View

2.
Reid R, Steel A, Wardle J, Trubody A, Adams J . Complementary medicine use by the Australian population: a critical mixed studies systematic review of utilisation, perceptions and factors associated with use. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016; 16:176. PMC: 4902999. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1143-8. View

3.
Chew L, Griffin J, Partin M, Noorbaloochi S, Grill J, Snyder A . Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(5):561-6. PMC: 2324160. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0520-5. View

4.
Hall H, Griffiths D, McKenna L . The use of complementary and alternative medicine by pregnant women: a literature review. Midwifery. 2011; 27(6):817-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.08.007. View

5.
Sirois F, Gick M . An investigation of the health beliefs and motivations of complementary medicine clients. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55(6):1025-37. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00229-5. View