» Articles » PMID: 32523267

Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of a Series of Patients Treated at a Single Institution

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Jun 12
PMID 32523267
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare heterogeneous tumors arising in the retroperitoneum with unique biological and behavioral patterns that are thought to be closely linked to histology. The aim of the study was to audit our results and analyze various clinico-pathological factors including surgical excision, histology, and their implications on the recurrences and survival outcomes in RPS. Retrospective analysis of patients treated at a tertiary referral center in India from March 2008 to July 2017 was performed. The clinico-pathological variables were analyzed for their association with tumor recurrence and survival with special emphasis on histological subtype. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). One hundred consecutive patients operated for RPS were analyzed. Of these, 27 were operated for recurrent tumors. Liposarcomas (LPS) and leiomyosarcomas (LMS) constituted 50% ( = 50) and 30% ( = 30) of patients respectively. Complete tumor excision was achieved in 83%, with 43% patients undergoing adjacent organ resection. At a median follow-up of 25.3 months, the median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30 months and 87.8 months respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor grade was the only factor to significantly affect survival ( = 0.001 for DFS and 0.005 for OS). There was no difference in survival outcomes between infiltrative and adhesive tumors with respect to adjacent organ invasion ( = 0.361 for OS). Tumor grade remains an important prognostic factor affecting disease-free and overall survival in retroperitoneal sarcomas irrespective of tumor size, site, and histology.

Citing Articles

Leiomyosarcoma of the abdomen and retroperitoneum; a systematic review.

Oines M, Smith H, Preisler L, Penninga L Front Surg. 2024; 11:1375483.

PMID: 39086921 PMC: 11288885. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1375483.


Giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma measuring 27 × 29 × 36 cm: a case report.

Gutu C, Butnari V, Schiopu V J Surg Case Rep. 2023; 2023(1):rjac608.

PMID: 36636659 PMC: 9831642. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjac608.


Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: a Current Review on Management.

Patkar S, Kattepur A, Khanna N, Bajpai J Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022; 13(3):542-558.

PMID: 36187536 PMC: 9515254. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01520-y.

References
1.
Tan M, Brennan M, Kuk D, Agaram N, Antonescu C, Qin L . Histology-based Classification Predicts Pattern of Recurrence and Improves Risk Stratification in Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma. Ann Surg. 2015; 263(3):593-600. PMC: 4619189. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001149. View

2.
MacNeill A, Fiore M . Surgical morbidity in retroperitoneal sarcoma resection. J Surg Oncol. 2018; 117(1):56-61. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24902. View

3.
Fairweather M, Wang J, Jo V, Baldini E, Bertagnolli M, Raut C . Incidence and Adverse Prognostic Implications of Histopathologic Organ Invasion in Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2017; 224(5):876-883. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.044. View

4.
MacNeill A, Gronchi A, Miceli R, Bonvalot S, Swallow C, Hohenberger P . Postoperative Morbidity After Radical Resection of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Report From the Transatlantic RPS Working Group. Ann Surg. 2017; 267(5):959-964. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002250. View

5.
Hogg H, Manas D, Lee D, Dildey P, Scott J, Lunec J . Surgical outcome and patterns of recurrence for retroperitoneal sarcoma at a single centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016; 98(3):192-7. PMC: 5226156. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0057. View