» Articles » PMID: 32522826

Diagnostic Accuracy of Pan-Degenerate Amplification and Adaptation Assay for HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutation Analysis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2020 Jun 12
PMID 32522826
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) is a barrier to sustained virologic suppression in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Point mutation assays targeting priority drug resistance mutations (DRMs) are being evaluated to improve access to HIVDR testing. In a cross-sectional study (June 2018 to September 2019), we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a simple and rapid HIVDR assay (the pan-degenerate amplification and adaptation [PANDAA] assay targeting the mutations K65R, K103NS, M184VI, Y181C, and G190A) compared to Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Plasma samples from adolescents and young adults (aged 10 to 24 years) failing antiretroviral therapy (viral load, >1,000 copies/ml on 2 consecutive occasions 1 month apart) were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity of the PANDAA assay were determined by a proprietary application designed by Aldatu Biosciences. Agreement between genotyping methods was evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient. One hundred fifty samples previously characterized by Sanger sequencing were evaluated using PANDAA. For all DRMs detected, PANDAA showed a sensitivity and specificity of 98% and 94%, respectively. For nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor DRMs, sensitivity and specificity were 98% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92% to 100%) and 100% (94% to 100%), respectively. For non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor DRMs, sensitivity and specificity were 100% (97% to 100%) and 76% (61% to 87%), respectively. PANDAA showed strong agreement with Sanger sequencing for K65R, K103NS, M184VI, and G190A (kappa > 0.85) and substantial agreement for Y181C (kappa = 0.720). Of the 21 false-positive samples genotyped by PANDAA, only 6 (29%) were identified as low-abundance variants by NGS. With the high sensitivity and specificity to detect major DRMs, PANDAA could represent a simple and rapid alternative HIVDR assay in LMICs.

Citing Articles

Comparing pill counts and patient self-reports versus DBS tenofovir concentrations as ART adherence measurements with virologic outcomes and HIV drug resistance in a cohort of adolescents and young adults failing ART in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Mtisi T, Kouamou V, Morse G, Dzinamarira T, Ndhlovu C J Infect Public Health. 2024; 17(9):102500.

PMID: 39173560 PMC: 11393767. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102500.


Need assessment for HIV drug resistance testing and landscape of current and future technologies in low- and middle-income countries.

Parkin N, Harrigan P, Inzaule S, Bertagnolio S PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(10):e0001948.

PMID: 37851634 PMC: 10584185. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001948.


HIV drug resistance monitoring in the era of dolutegravir and injectable long-acting cabotegravir in resource-limited settings.

Washaya T, Manasa J, Kouamou V AIDS. 2023; 37(10):1629-1631.

PMID: 37450629 PMC: 11260431. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003600.


Advancing HIV Drug Resistance Technologies and Strategies: Insights from South Africa's Experience and Future Directions for Resource-Limited Settings.

Steegen K, van Zyl G, Claassen M, Khan A, Pillay M, Govender S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(13).

PMID: 37443603 PMC: 10340187. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132209.


Point-of-Care Tests for HIV Drug Resistance Monitoring: Advances and Potentials.

Chua R, Capina R, Ji H Pathogens. 2022; 11(7).

PMID: 35889970 PMC: 9321160. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11070724.


References
1.
Saag M, Benson C, Gandhi R, Hoy J, Landovitz R, Mugavero M . Antiretroviral Drugs for Treatment and Prevention of HIV Infection in Adults: 2018 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel. JAMA. 2018; 320(4):379-396. PMC: 6415748. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.8431. View

2.
Meldrum C, Doyle M, Tothill R . Next-generation sequencing for cancer diagnostics: a practical perspective. Clin Biochem Rev. 2011; 32(4):177-95. PMC: 3219767. View

3.
Gianella S, Delport W, Pacold M, Young J, Choi J, Little S . Detection of minority resistance during early HIV-1 infection: natural variation and spurious detection rather than transmission and evolution of multiple viral variants. J Virol. 2011; 85(16):8359-67. PMC: 3147985. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02582-10. View

4.
Chimukangara B, Varyani B, Shamu T, Mutsvangwa J, Manasa J, White E . HIV drug resistance testing among patients failing second line antiretroviral therapy. Comparison of in-house and commercial sequencing. J Virol Methods. 2016; 243:151-157. PMC: 5393912. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.11.010. View

5.
Vilsker M, Moosa Y, Nooij S, Fonseca V, Ghysens Y, Dumon K . Genome Detective: an automated system for virus identification from high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2018; 35(5):871-873. PMC: 6524403. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty695. View