» Articles » PMID: 32521738

Improved Outcome Prediction for Appendiceal Pseudomyxoma Peritonei by Integration of Cancer Cell and Stromal Transcriptional Profiles

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Jun 12
PMID 32521738
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have substantially improved the clinical outcome of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) originating from mucinous appendiceal cancer. However, current histopathological grading of appendiceal PMP frequently fails in predicting disease outcome. We recently observed that the integration of cancer cell transcriptional traits with those of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) improves prognostic prediction for tumors of the large intestine. We therefore generated global expression profiles on a consecutive series of 24 PMP patients treated with CRS plus HIPEC. Multiple lesions were profiled for nine patients. We then used expression data to stratify the samples by a previously published "high-risk appendiceal cancer" (HRAC) signature and by a CAF signature that we previously developed for colorectal cancer, or by a combination of both. The prognostic value of the HRAC signature was confirmed in our cohort and further improved by integration of the CAF signature. Classification of cases profiled for multiple lesions revealed the existence of outlier samples and highlighted the need of profiling multiple PMP lesions to select representative samples for optimal performances. The integrated predictor was subsequently validated in an independent PMP cohort. These results provide new insights into PMP biology, revealing a previously unrecognized prognostic role of the stromal component and supporting integration of standard pathological grade with the HRAC and CAF transcriptional signatures to better predict disease outcome.

Citing Articles

Distinct gene signatures define the epithelial cell features of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma metastases.

Ayala C, Sathe A, Bai X, Grimes S, Shen J, Poultsides G Front Genet. 2025; 16:1536982.

PMID: 40018643 PMC: 11865047. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1536982.


Progress on immuno-microenvironment and immune-related therapies in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei.

Zhao Q, Wei T, Ma R, Fu Y, Yang R, Su Y Cancer Biol Med. 2024; 21(7).

PMID: 39026438 PMC: 11271218. DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0109.


A Review of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: Insights Into Diagnosis, Management, and Prognosis.

Shringi Jr S, Agrawal A, Gadkari P Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e61244.

PMID: 38939264 PMC: 11210681. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61244.


A nomogram prediction model of pseudomyxoma peritonei established based on new prognostic factors of HE stained pathological images analysis.

Ma R, Su Y, Yan F, Lin Y, Gao Y, Li Y Cancer Med. 2024; 13(6):e7101.

PMID: 38506243 PMC: 10952024. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7101.


Tumor-stroma ratio as a new prognosticator for pseudomyxoma peritonei: a comprehensive clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study.

Ma R, Lin Y, Li X, Yan F, Xu H, Peng Z Diagn Pathol. 2021; 16(1):116.

PMID: 34895284 PMC: 8667412. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-021-01177-1.


References
1.
Nishikawa G, Sekine S, Ogawa R, Matsubara A, Mori T, Taniguchi H . Frequent GNAS mutations in low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(4):951-8. PMC: 3590682. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.47. View

2.
Guinney J, Dienstmann R, Wang X, De Reynies A, Schlicker A, Soneson C . The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015; 21(11):1350-6. PMC: 4636487. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3967. View

3.
Kusamura S, Hutanu I, Baratti D, Deraco M . Circulating tumor markers: predictors of incomplete cytoreduction and powerful determinants of outcome in pseudomyxoma peritonei. J Surg Oncol. 2013; 108(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1002/jso.23329. View

4.
Levine E, Votanopoulos K, Qasem S, Philip J, Cummins K, Chou J . Prognostic Molecular Subtypes of Low-Grade Cancer of the Appendix. J Am Coll Surg. 2016; 222(4):493-503. PMC: 4808611. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.012. View

5.
Du P, Kibbe W, Lin S . lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24(13):1547-8. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn224. View