Movement Pattern Training Compared with Standard Strengthening and Flexibility Among Patients with Hip-related Groin Pain: Results of a Pilot Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Study Design: Pilot, multicentre randomised clinical trial (RCT).
Objectives: Assess viability of performing a definitive RCT and compare preliminary effects of movement pattern training (MoveTrain) and strengthening/flexibility (Standard) to improve function in people with chronic hip-related groin pain (HRGP).
Background: To determine the best physical therapist-led intervention for patients with HRGP, we must understand treatment effects of different treatment modes.
Methods: Forty-six patients (17M:29F; 29±5.3 years; body mass index 25.6±6.3 kg/m) with HRGP were randomised. MoveTrain included task-specific training to optimise biomechanics during daily tasks. Standard included strengthening/flexibility. Treatment included 10 visits/12 weeks and home exercise programme (HEP). Primary outcomes for feasibility were recruitment, retention, treatment adherence and treatment fidelity. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported function (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)), lower extremity kinematics and hip muscle strength.
Results: We achieved target recruitment, and retention was excellent (91%). Patient session attendance was high (93%); however, reported HEP adherence (62%) was lower than expected. Physical therapists' adherence to treatment protocols was high (90%). Patients demonstrated high treatment receipt; 91% of exercises performed were rated independent. Both groups demonstrated clinically important improvements in function (HOOS) and muscle strength; however, there were no between-group differences (HOOS subscales, p≥0.13, strength, p≥0.34). Compared with Standard, MoveTrain demonstrated greater reductions in hip adduction (p=0.016) and pelvic drop (p=0.026) during a single leg squat. No adverse events were noted.
Conclusion: Our experience in completing this RCT confirmed that a larger, multicentre RCT is feasible and highlighted modifications we will implement to optimise the future RCT.
Trial Registration Number: NCT02913222.
Vandenberg N, Wheatley B, Dana Carpenter R, Christiansen C, Stoneback J, Gaffney B Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2024; :1-15.
PMID: 39256913 PMC: 11891085. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2024.2399038.
Devecchi V, Saunders M, Galaiya S, Shaw M, Gallina A PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0288760.
PMID: 37992071 PMC: 10664960. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288760.
Harris-Hayes M, Zorn P, Steger-May K, Burgess M, DeMargel R, Kuebler S Phys Ther. 2023; 103(11).
PMID: 37606253 PMC: 10683042. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad111.
Lahuerta-Martin S, Robles-Perez R, Hernando-Garijo I, Jimenez-Del-Barrio S, Hernandez-Lazaro H, Mingo-Gomez M BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023; 15(1):81.
PMID: 37430335 PMC: 10332077. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-023-00684-6.
Probst D, Sookochoff M, Harris-Hayes M, Prather H, Lipsey K, Cheng A J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023; 53(5):286–306.
PMID: 36892224 PMC: 10176100. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11666.