» Articles » PMID: 32518674

Movement Pattern Training Compared with Standard Strengthening and Flexibility Among Patients with Hip-related Groin Pain: Results of a Pilot Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Jun 11
PMID 32518674
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Pilot, multicentre randomised clinical trial (RCT).

Objectives: Assess viability of performing a definitive RCT and compare preliminary effects of movement pattern training (MoveTrain) and strengthening/flexibility (Standard) to improve function in people with chronic hip-related groin pain (HRGP).

Background: To determine the best physical therapist-led intervention for patients with HRGP, we must understand treatment effects of different treatment modes.

Methods: Forty-six patients (17M:29F; 29±5.3 years; body mass index 25.6±6.3 kg/m) with HRGP were randomised. MoveTrain included task-specific training to optimise biomechanics during daily tasks. Standard included strengthening/flexibility. Treatment included 10 visits/12 weeks and home exercise programme (HEP). Primary outcomes for feasibility were recruitment, retention, treatment adherence and treatment fidelity. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported function (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)), lower extremity kinematics and hip muscle strength.

Results: We achieved target recruitment, and retention was excellent (91%). Patient session attendance was high (93%); however, reported HEP adherence (62%) was lower than expected. Physical therapists' adherence to treatment protocols was high (90%). Patients demonstrated high treatment receipt; 91% of exercises performed were rated independent. Both groups demonstrated clinically important improvements in function (HOOS) and muscle strength; however, there were no between-group differences (HOOS subscales, p≥0.13, strength, p≥0.34). Compared with Standard, MoveTrain demonstrated greater reductions in hip adduction (p=0.016) and pelvic drop (p=0.026) during a single leg squat. No adverse events were noted.

Conclusion: Our experience in completing this RCT confirmed that a larger, multicentre RCT is feasible and highlighted modifications we will implement to optimise the future RCT.

Trial Registration Number: NCT02913222.

Citing Articles

Feasibility of predicting changes in gait biomechanics following muscle strength perturbations using optimal control in patients with transfemoral amputation.

Vandenberg N, Wheatley B, Dana Carpenter R, Christiansen C, Stoneback J, Gaffney B Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2024; :1-15.

PMID: 39256913 PMC: 11891085. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2024.2399038.


Remote assessment of pelvic kinematics during single leg squat using smartphone sensors: Between-day reliability and identification of acute changes in motor performance.

Devecchi V, Saunders M, Galaiya S, Shaw M, Gallina A PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0288760.

PMID: 37992071 PMC: 10664960. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288760.


Comparison of Joint Mobilization and Movement Pattern Training for Patients With Hip-Related Groin Pain: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Harris-Hayes M, Zorn P, Steger-May K, Burgess M, DeMargel R, Kuebler S Phys Ther. 2023; 103(11).

PMID: 37606253 PMC: 10683042. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad111.


The effectiveness of non-surgical interventions in athletes with groin pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lahuerta-Martin S, Robles-Perez R, Hernando-Garijo I, Jimenez-Del-Barrio S, Hernandez-Lazaro H, Mingo-Gomez M BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023; 15(1):81.

PMID: 37430335 PMC: 10332077. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-023-00684-6.


What is the Rate of Response to Nonoperative Treatment for Hip-Related Pain? A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

Probst D, Sookochoff M, Harris-Hayes M, Prather H, Lipsey K, Cheng A J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023; 53(5):286–306.

PMID: 36892224 PMC: 10176100. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11666.


References
1.
Ayeni O, Belzile E, Musahl V, Naudie D, Crouch S, Sprague S . Results of the PeRception of femOroaCetabular impingEment by Surgeons Survey (PROCESS). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22(4):906-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2882-z. View

2.
Harris-Hayes M, Royer N . Relationship of acetabular dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement to hip osteoarthritis: a focused review. PM R. 2011; 3(11):1055-1067.e1. PMC: 3427648. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.08.533. View

3.
Bazett-Jones D, Cobb S, Joshi M, Cashin S, Earl J . Normalizing hip muscle strength: establishing body-size-independent measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 92(1):76-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.020. View

4.
Bennell K, ODonnell J, Takla A, Spiers L, Hunter D, Staples M . Efficacy of a physiotherapy rehabilitation program for individuals undergoing arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement - the FAIR trial: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15:58. PMC: 3941691. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-58. View

5.
Hoffmann T, Glasziou P, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D . Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014; 348:g1687. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g1687. View