» Articles » PMID: 32518656

Characteristics of Methicillin-resistant Carrying the Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin Gene: High Prevalence of Clonal Complex 22 Strains and the Emergence of New Types T223 and T605 in Iran

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Jun 11
PMID 32518656
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strains that carry the gene are disseminated worldwide with varying regional incidences and different genetic backgrounds. The data on molecular characteristics of these strains is insufficient in Iran. The present study aimed to assess the characteristics and distribution of types of -positive MRSA strains. We investigated 89 MRSA isolates carrying the gene with typing, resistance gene detection and antimicrobial susceptibility. Of the 89 tested isolates, 61 (68.5%) were confirmed as multidrug resistant (MDR). The isolates were distributed across seven clonal complexes (CCs) including CC22 (42.7%), CC8 (28.1%), CC5 (11.2%), CC59 (5.6%), CC30 (4.5%), CC80 (4.5%) and CC15 (3.4%). typing identified 11 distinct types, with t223 (16.9%) and t790 (15.7%) being the most prevalent. All high-level mupirocin-resistant strains belonged to t002 ( = 8) and low-level mupirocin-resistant strains belonged to t790 ( = 6) types. Fusidic-acid-resistant isolates belonged to t437 ( = 3). iMLS phenotype was observed in t005 (6.7%), t002 (5.6%), t790 (3.4%), and t030, t044 and t084 (each 2.2%). It was found that in the -carrying MRSA strains, there were genetic diversities with a majority of the t223 type. Indeed, there is a necessity for more constructive surveillance/infection control strategies to address the prevalence and prevention of the emerging types.

Citing Articles

Methicillin-Resistant : The Shifting Landscape in the United Arab Emirates.

Boucherabine S, Nassar R, Mohamed L, Habous M, Nabi A, Husain R Antibiotics (Basel). 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 39858310 PMC: 11759823. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14010024.


The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2020/2021.

EFSA J. 2023; 21(3):e07867.

PMID: 36891283 PMC: 9987209. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7867.

References
1.
Gadepalli R, Dhawan B, Mohanty S, Kapil A, Das B, Chaudhry R . Mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in an Indian hospital. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007; 58(1):125-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.10.012. View

2.
da Cunha M, Calsolari R, Araujo Junior J . Detection of enterotoxin and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 genes in Staphylococcus, with emphasis on coagulase-negative staphylococci. Microbiol Immunol. 2007; 51(4):381-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2007.tb03925.x. View

3.
Jones J, Rogers T, Brookmeyer P, Dunne Jr W, Storch G, Coopersmith C . Mupirocin resistance in patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a surgical intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 45(5):541-7. DOI: 10.1086/520663. View

4.
Jarajreh D, Aqel A, Alzoubi H, Al-Zereini W . Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the first study in Jordan. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017; 11(4):350-354. DOI: 10.3855/jidc.8316. View

5.
Lee S, Lee C, Shih H, Chiou M, See L, Siu L . Clinical features and risk factors of mortality for bacteremia due to community-onset healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013; 76(1):86-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.01.017. View