» Articles » PMID: 32514114

Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes of Women with Disabilities: a Nationwide Population-based Study in South Korea

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Jun 10
PMID 32514114
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated (1) pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with and without disabilities, (2) time trends in deliveries, and (3) risks of pregnancy and neonatal complications among women with various disability types and severity. This was a nationwide population-based study merging the database of the Korea National Health Insurance claims, National Health Screening Program for Infants and Children, and Disability Registration System to compare perinatal outcomes in women with and without disabilities. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were analyzed during 2007 and 2015, as were time trends of deliveries. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate risk of perinatal outcomes among women with various disability types and severities. Women with disabilities showed higher rates of cesarean section (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.69-1.77), hypertensive disorders (aOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.63-1.86), placenta abruption (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.45), placenta previa (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24), stillbirths (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.17-1.45), preterm births (aOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.57-1.78), and LBW (aOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.78-1.97) than those without disabilities. From 2007 to 2015, although delivery rate in women with disabilities decreased steeply compared with that in women without disabilities, the rate of cesarean section increased in women with disabilities. Women with intellectual disability and those with vision impairment had the highest number of perinatal complications among women with various types of disabilities. Women with disability had more adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes than those without disabilities. Specific disability types & severities are more vulnerable to specific perinatal complications.

Citing Articles

The Right to Sexuality, Reproductive Health, and Found a Family for People with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.

Perez-Curiel P, Vicente E, Moran M, Gomez L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(2).

PMID: 36674341 PMC: 9864803. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021587.

References
1.
Schildberger B, Zenzmaier C, Konig-Bachmann M . Experiences of Austrian mothers with mobility or sensory impairments during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):201. PMC: 5485540. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1388-3. View

2.
Horner-Johnson W, Kulkarni-Rajasekhara S, Darney B, Dissanayake M, Caughey A . Live birth, miscarriage, and abortion among U.S. women with and without disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2017; 10(3):382-386. PMC: 5544009. DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.02.006. View

3.
Mitra M, Clements K, Zhang J, Iezzoni L, Smeltzer S, Long-Bellil L . Maternal Characteristics, Pregnancy Complications, and Adverse Birth Outcomes Among Women With Disabilities. Med Care. 2015; 53(12):1027-32. PMC: 4648667. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000427. View

4.
Breckenridge J, Devaney J, Kroll T, Lazenbatt A, Taylor J, Bradbury-Jones C . Access and utilisation of maternity care for disabled women who experience domestic abuse: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:234. PMC: 4223363. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-234. View

5.
Hoglund B, Lindgren P, Larsson M . Pregnancy and birth outcomes of women with intellectual disability in Sweden: a national register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91(12):1381-7. PMC: 3549474. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01509.x. View