» Articles » PMID: 32511203

Lung Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Ultrasound Q
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Jun 9
PMID 32511203
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chest radiography is the primary imaging modality used for the assessment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) in newborns. However, excessively exposing a growing neonate to harmful ionizing radiation may have long-term consequences. Some studies have shown that lung ultrasound (LUS) is helpful in the diagnosis of NRDS. A comprehensive search was carried out using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies in which newborns with clinically suspected NRDS were assessed by LUS. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted the data. Any discrepancies were resolved via discussion with the senior author. Study quality was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool, and pooled sensitivity and specificity of various LUS findings for diagnosing NRDS were determined. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the overall performance of LUS. Ten studies with a total of 887 neonates were included in this meta-analysis. There was significant heterogeneity across the included studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio for the diagnosis of NRDS using LUS were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.94), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97), 20.23 (95% CI, 8.54-47.92), 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.14), and 455.30 (95% CI, 153.01-1354.79), respectively. Furthermore, the summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve was calculated to be 0.9888. The main LUS characteristics of NRDS include bilateral white lung, pleural line abnormalities, and lung consolidation. In summary, LUS is a highly valuable diagnostic technology that complements chest radiography in the diagnosis and follow-up monitoring of NRDS.

Citing Articles

Guidelines for the use of lung ultrasound to optimise the management of neonatal respiratory distress: international expert consensus.

Liu J, Inchingolo R, Suryawanshi P, Guo B, Kurepa D, Cortes R BMC Med. 2025; 23(1):114.

PMID: 39988689 PMC: 11849336. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-03879-5.


Lung Ultrasound in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Narrative Review of the Last 10 Years.

Costa F, Titolo A, Ferrocino M, Biagi E, DellOrto V, Perrone S Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39767155 PMC: 11674376. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14242793.


Current Trends in the Imaging Diagnosis of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (NRDS): Chest X-ray Versus Lung Ultrasound.

Popa A, Popescu S, Tecuci A, Bot M, Vladareanu S Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69787.

PMID: 39429372 PMC: 11490972. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69787.


A nationwide survey on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: insights from the MUNICH survey in 394 Chinese hospitals.

Chen L, Ji Y, Ju R, Liu J, Liu L, Shi J Ital J Pediatr. 2024; 50(1):168.

PMID: 39244592 PMC: 11380405. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-024-01741-7.


Point-of-care ultrasound in early diagnosis and monitoring of deep abscess in newborns: a case report of two cases.

Du B, Xu F, Deng B, Zhong B, Li N, He X Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1325395.

PMID: 38751745 PMC: 11094334. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1325395.


References
1.
Deeks J, Macaskill P, Irwig L . The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58(9):882-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016. View

2.
Corsini I, Parri N, Gozzini E, Coviello C, Leonardi V, Poggi C . Lung Ultrasound for the Differential Diagnosis of Respiratory Distress in Neonates. Neonatology. 2018; 115(1):77-84. DOI: 10.1159/000493001. View

3.
Deeks J . Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ. 2001; 323(7305):157-62. PMC: 1120791. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157. View

4.
McInnes M, Moher D, Thombs B, McGrath T, Bossuyt P, Clifford T . Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA. 2018; 319(4):388-396. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163. View

5.
Joshi S, Kotecha S . Lung growth and development. Early Hum Dev. 2007; 83(12):789-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.09.007. View