» Articles » PMID: 32510462

Effectiveness of a 3-Month Mobile Phone-Based Behavior Change Program on Active Transportation and Physical Activity in Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Active transportation (AT; ie, walking and cycling as a mode for transportation) has been associated with decreased morbidity and mortality; however, low-cost and scalable intervention programs are lacking.

Objective: The goal of the research was to determine the effectiveness of a 3-month behavior change program delivered via a mobile phone app to promote AT (TravelVu Plus) on time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

Methods: For this 2-arm parallel randomized controlled trial, we recruited a population-based sample of 254 adults from Stockholm County who were aged 20 to 65 years and had access to a smartphone. On completion of 1-week baseline measures, the 254 participants were randomized to either the control or intervention group (1:1 ratio). Both groups had access to the standard TravelVu app (Trivector AB) for monitoring their AT for 6 months. The intervention group also received a 3-month behavior change program to promote AT (TravelVu Plus app). Assessors of outcomes were blinded to group allocation. Outcomes were objectively measured MVPA at 3 (primary) and 6 months. Secondary outcomes were AT, attitudes toward AT, and health-related quality of life at 3 and 6 months.

Results: No effect on MVPA was observed after 3 months (P=.29); however, at 6 months the intervention group had a greater improvement in MVPA than the controls (6.05 minutes per day [95% CI 0.36 to 11.74; P=.04]). A Bayesian analyses showed that there was a 98% probability that the intervention had any effect at 6 months, and a 63% probability that this effect was >5 minute MVPA per day.

Conclusions: No effect on MVPA immediately after the intervention period (at 3 months) was observed; however, there was a delayed effect on MVPA (6 minutes per day) at 6 months, which corresponds to approximately 30% of the weekly MVPA recommendation. Our findings suggest that a behavior change program promoting AT delivered via an app may have a relevant effect on PA.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03086837; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03086837.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): RR2-10.1186/s12889-018-5658-4.

Citing Articles

Promoting active transportation through technology: a scoping review of mobile apps for walking and cycling.

Siriaporn N, de Nazelle A, Vuillemin A BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):952.

PMID: 40065314 PMC: 11895142. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-22131-6.


Effect of digital health applications with or without gamification on physical activity and cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Nishi S, Kavanagh M, Ramboanga K, Ayoub-Charette S, Modol S, Dias G EClinicalMedicine. 2025; 76():102798.

PMID: 39764571 PMC: 11701442. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102798.


Estimating the Health Effects of Adding Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths at the Census Tract Level: Multiple Model Comparison.

Gore R, Lynch C, Jordan C, Collins A, Robinson R, Fuller G JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022; 8(8):e37379.

PMID: 36001362 PMC: 9453587. DOI: 10.2196/37379.


Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations.

Norris E, Sulevani I, Finnerty A, Castro O BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022; 8(2):e001282.

PMID: 35722044 PMC: 9174779. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001282.


Clinical Outcomes Among Working Adults Using the Health Integrator Smartphone App: Analyses of Prespecified Secondary Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bonn S, Licitra G, Bellocco R, Trolle Lagerros Y J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(3):e24725.

PMID: 35311677 PMC: 8946520. DOI: 10.2196/24725.


References
1.
Sallis J, Cervero R, Ascher W, Henderson K, Kraft M, Kerr J . An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27:297-322. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100. View

2.
Saelens B, Sallis J, Black J, Chen D . Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(9):1552-8. PMC: 1448009. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1552. View

3.
Ekblom-Bak E, Olsson G, Ekblom O, Ekblom B, Bergstrom G, Borjesson M . The Daily Movement Pattern and Fulfilment of Physical Activity Recommendations in Swedish Middle-Aged Adults: The SCAPIS Pilot Study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0126336. PMC: 4430167. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126336. View

4.
Ekblom-Bak E, Ekblom O, Bergstrom G, Borjesson M . Isotemporal substitution of sedentary time by physical activity of different intensities and bout lengths, and its associations with metabolic risk. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015; 23(9):967-74. DOI: 10.1177/2047487315619734. View

5.
Kim H, Seo K . Smartphone-Based Health Program for Improving Physical Activity and Tackling Obesity for Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 17(1). PMC: 6982141. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010015. View