» Articles » PMID: 32508975

EEG Signal and Feature Interaction Modeling-Based Eye Behavior Prediction Research

Overview
Publisher Hindawi
Date 2020 Jun 9
PMID 32508975
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, with the development of brain science and biomedical engineering, as well as the rapid development of electroencephalogram (EEG) signal analysis methods, using EEG signals to monitor human health has become a very popular research field. The innovation of this paper is to analyze the EEG signal for the first time by building a depth factorization machine model, so that on the basis of analyzing the characteristics of user interaction, we can use EEG data to predict the binomial state of eyes (open eyes and closed eyes). The significance of the research is that we can diagnose the fatigue and the health of the human body by detecting the state of eyes for a long time. On the basis of this inference, the proposed method can make a further useful auxiliary support for improving the accuracy of the recommendation system recommendation results. In this paper, we first extract the features of EEG data by wavelet transform technology and then build a depth factorization machine model (FM+LSTM) which combines factorization machine (FM) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) in parallel. Through the test of real data set, the proposed model gets more efficient prediction results than other classifier models. In addition, the model proposed in this paper is suitable not only for the determination of eye features but also for the acquisition of interactive features (user fatigue) in the recommendation system. The conclusion obtained in this paper will be an important factor in the determination of user preferences in the recommendation system, which will be used in the analysis of interactive features by the graph neural network in the future work.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Model Accuracy in Eyes Open and Closed EEG Data: Effect of Data Pre-Processing and Validation Methods.

Mattiev J, Sajovic J, Drevensek G, Rogelj P Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(1).

PMID: 36671614 PMC: 9854523. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10010042.


Theta oscillations: A rhythm difference comparison between major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder.

Zhang Y, Lei L, Liu Z, Gao M, Liu Z, Sun N Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:827536.

PMID: 35990051 PMC: 9381950. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.827536.


Graph Neural Network and Context-Aware Based User Behavior Prediction and Recommendation System Research.

Gao Q, Ma P Comput Intell Neurosci. 2020; 2020:8812370.

PMID: 33312192 PMC: 7721495. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8812370.

References
1.
Coenen A . Neuronal activities underlying the electroencephalogram and evoked potentials of sleeping and waking: implications for information processing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1995; 19(3):447-63. DOI: 10.1016/0149-7634(95)00010-c. View

2.
Tahernezhad-Javazm F, Azimirad V, Shoaran M . A review and experimental study on the application of classifiers and evolutionary algorithms in EEG-based brain-machine interface systems. J Neural Eng. 2017; 15(2):021007. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa8063. View

3.
Kim T, Kittler J . Locally linear discriminant analysis for multimodally distributed classes for face recognition with a single model image. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2005; 27(3):318-327. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.58. View

4.
Huang R, Du S, Chen Z, Zhangzhen , Zhouyi . [The recognition methodology study of epileptic EEGs based on support vector machine]. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2014; 30(5):919-24. View

5.
Crowley K, Colrain I . A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115(4):732-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.021. View