» Articles » PMID: 32504205

Non-flap Hand-sewn Esophagogastrostomy As a Simple Anti-reflux Procedure in Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Jun 7
PMID 32504205
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: No ideal and generally accepted method of reconstruction for laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) has been established because of a high incidence of postoperative reflux and anastomotic stenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of LPG with a non-flap hand-sewn technique as a simple anti-reflux procedure for the upper part of clinical Stage I gastric cancer.

Methods: Between November 2016 and June 2019, 23 consecutive gastric cancer patients, who underwent curative LPG with lymphadenectomy, were enrolled in the study. In this study, we devised a simple hand-sewn technique for esophagogastrostomy, which comprises a 5-cm pseudo-fornix as a fundoplication, the posterior pressure mechanism by the remnant stomach and bilateral crus, and a flat-shaped anastomotic hole as a valvuloplasty.

Results: The median operation time and hospital stay was 325 min and 10 days, respectively. There was no patient with anastomotic leakage and delayed gastric empting. No patient had symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, but two patients (8.6% (2/23): Grade M and Grade A) had endoscopic findings during a follow-up period of more than 6 months. There was no patient with Grade B or more severe reflux esophagitis. One patient (4.3%, 1/23) developed anastomotic stenosis, which was resolved with endoscopic dilatation. The mean body weight loss at 6 months after surgery was 7.5% in comparison with the preoperative body weight.

Conclusion: Our non-flap hand-sewn technique for esophagogastrostomy had favorable outcomes and might be one of reliable techniques as an anti-reflux procedure in LPG for gastric cancer.

Citing Articles

Differences in glycemic trends due to reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy from the perspective of continuous glucose-monitoring.

Shoda K, Kubota T, Kawaguchi Y, Akaike H, Maruyama S, Higuchi Y Surg Today. 2024; 54(9):1104-1111.

PMID: 38649530 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02845-7.


A Novel Esophagogastrostomy Technique for Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy: Conical Remnant Gastroesophageal Side-overlap Fundoplication.

Wang L, Ma H, Ren P, Chang H, Wang Y, Chen Y Cancer Diagn Progn. 2023; 3(5):609-615.

PMID: 37671301 PMC: 10475915. DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10263.


Laparoscopic Function-Preserving Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Kano Y, Ohashi M, Nunobe S Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(1).

PMID: 36612308 PMC: 9818997. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010311.


Simple modifications of conventional esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy adequately reduces the postoperative reflux esophagitis: a retrospective analysis of posterolateral fundoplication.

Aizawa M, Yabusaki H, Nakada K, Matsuki A, Bamba T, Nakagawa S Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022; 407(7):3153-3160.

PMID: 35902383 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02628-z.


Simple and reliable transhiatal reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with lower esophagectomy for Siewert type II tumors: y-shaped overlap esophagogastric tube reconstruction.

Kanaji S, Suzuki S, Yamamoto M, Tanigawa K, Harada H, Urakawa N Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022; 407(5):1881-1890.

PMID: 35486151 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02536-2.


References
1.
Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K . Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994; 4(2):146-8. View

2.
Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N . A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg. 2007; 245(1):68-72. PMC: 1867926. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225364.03133.f8. View

3.
Honda M, Hiki N, Kinoshita T, Yabusaki H, Abe T, Nunobe S . Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The LOC-1 Study. Ann Surg. 2016; 264(2):214-22. PMC: 4957962. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001654. View

4.
Veenhof A, Vlug M, van der Pas M, Sietses C, van der Peet D, de Lange-de Klerk E . Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012; 255(2):216-21. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824336e2. View

5.
Ahn H, Lee H, Yoo M, Jeong S, Park D, Kim H . Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period. Br J Surg. 2010; 98(2):255-60. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7310. View