» Articles » PMID: 32502222

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer After Preoperative Chemotherapy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Jun 6
PMID 32502222
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although identified to be at a higher risk of relapse, no consensus exists on the treatment of breast cancer (BC) patients with no pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) in this context has scarcely been studied. We evaluated the benefit of administrating adjuvant chemotherapy in a real life cohort of BC patients with invasive residual disease after NAC. 1199 female BC patients with T1-3NxM0 invasive tumors receiving NAC at Institut Curie from 2002 to 2012 were included in the analysis. 1061 had been treated by NAC only, whereas 138 had received additional adjuvant chemotherapy after NAC (FUN protocol: 5-FU-Vinorelbine). We compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates between patients having received NAC only and patients having received NAC+ADJ. To ensure comparability of our populations, we used a propensity score (which defines the probability of treatment assignment conditional on observed baseline covariates) and matched each patient having received NAC+ADJ (n = 138) with a patient having received NAC only that had a similar propensity score value. Before propensity score matching, DFS and OS rates were significantly lower in the NAC+ADJ group compared to NAC only, after 3 years, 5 years and 10 years follow-up (p<0.01). After one-to-one PS matching, the two groups were comparable (n = 276 patients; 138 patients in each group). No significant difference was found regarding DFS (p = 0.87) or OS (p = 0.59) rates, neither in global population, nor by pathological subtype. Although our study did not show a benefit of administrating ADJ with FUN protocol (5-Florouracil- Vinorelbine) to BC patients with residual disease after NAC, further studies are warranted to determine the impact of other adjuvant regimens. Thereby, patients with little chance of responding to particular regimens could avoid the toxicity of futile therapy, and be study participants in evaluations of novel treatment strategies.

Citing Articles

Treatment Strategies for Residual Disease following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Abdel-Razeq H, Khalil H, Assi H, Bou Dargham T Curr Oncol. 2022; 29(8):5810-5822.

PMID: 36005196 PMC: 9406771. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080458.


Pathological examination of breast cancer samples before and after neoadjuvant therapy: recommendations from the Italian Group for the Study of Breast Pathology - Italian Society of Pathology (GIPaM-SIAPeC).

Fusco N, Rizzo A, Costarelli L, Santinelli A, Cerbelli B, Scatena C Pathologica. 2022; 114(2):104-110.

PMID: 35414722 PMC: 9248246. DOI: 10.32074/1591-951X-747.


Pathology after neoadjuvant treatment - How to assess residual disease.

Viale G, Fusco N Breast. 2021; 62 Suppl 1:S25-S28.

PMID: 34810049 PMC: 9097800. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.009.


Comparison of BSGI and MRI as Approaches to Evaluating Residual Tumor Status after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Chinese Women with Breast Cancer.

Liu H, Zhan H, Zhang Y, He G, Wang H, Zhang Q Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34679544 PMC: 8534722. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101846.

References
1.
Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E . Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26 Suppl 5:v8-30. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv298. View

2.
Mieog J, van der Hage J, van de Velde C . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2007; 94(10):1189-200. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5894. View

3.
Austin P, Grootendorst P, Anderson G . A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 2006; 26(4):734-53. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2580. View

4.
Chen G, Guo Z, Liu M, Yao G, Dong J, Guo J . Clinical Value of Capecitabine-Based Combination Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Oncol Res. 2017; 25(9):1567-1578. PMC: 7841120. DOI: 10.3727/096504017X14897173032733. View

5.
Bear H, Anderson S, Smith R, Geyer Jr C, Mamounas E, Fisher B . Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(13):2019-27. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.1665. View