» Articles » PMID: 32501964

A Comparison Between Perpendicular and Parallel Plating Methods for Distal Humerus Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Jun 6
PMID 32501964
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of perpendicular and parallel plating for the treatment of distal humerus fractures.

Methods: Two investigators independently searched PubMed, OVID, and ScienceDirect databases prior to April 2019, without any limitations on language or publication status. The outcomes were union time, range of motion of elbow, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and postoperative complications. Two authors independently performed a methodological quality and risk of bias assessment using Cochrane collaboration's tool. Data analysis was performed with STATA version 13.0.

Results: Six randomized controlled trials with 305 participants were included. The present meta-analysis indicated that orthogonal plating was associated with a longer union time compared with parallel plating. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding Elbow function, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, operation time, reduction quality, or postoperative complications.

Conclusion: Both parallel plating and orthogonal plating are considered to be effective methods when treating distal humerus fractures. The results of this study found that parallel plating is superior to orthogonal plating in humerus fracture healing.

Citing Articles

Management of extra-articular fracture of the distal humerus with the upside-down use of PHILOS plates in front of the humerus: a retrospective study of 20 patients after 28.3 months.

Li G, Cui Y, Hua X, Liu F, Li D, Lu J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):952.

PMID: 39587632 PMC: 11587592. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08098-2.


Outcomes at mean follow-up of four years following AO type-C distal humerus fractures managed with fixation or arthroplasty.

Allen J, Budworth L, Cowling P, Tunstall C, Limb D, Vollans S Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241283909.

PMID: 39545001 PMC: 11559901. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241283909.


Surgical Challenges and Outcomes in Treating a Floating Upper Arm With Multiple Humerus Fractures and Radial Neck Fractures.

Sachinis N, Mitsios N, Baxevanou M, Koukos C, Givissis A, Givissis P Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66468.

PMID: 39246982 PMC: 11380566. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66468.


Intra-articular Distal Humerus Fractures: Parallel Versus Orthogonal Plating.

Haglin J, Kugelman D, Lott A, Belayneh R, Konda S, Egol K HSS J. 2022; 18(2):256-263.

PMID: 35645650 PMC: 9096995. DOI: 10.1177/15563316211009810.


Comparative study of functional outcomes between OTA/AO type C, Gustilo type I/II open fractures and closed fractures of the distal humerus treated by open reduction and internal fixation.

Chen C, Xiao D, Li T, Gong M, Zha Y, Hua K BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):939.

PMID: 34758812 PMC: 8582176. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04817-1.

References
1.
Shin S, Sohn H, Do N . A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intraarticular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 19(1):2-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.003. View

2.
Stoffel K, Cunneen S, Morgan R, Nicholls R, Stachowiak G . Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Res. 2008; 26(6):778-84. DOI: 10.1002/jor.20528. View

3.
Nauth A, McKee M, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch E . Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(7):686-700. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00845. View

4.
Gofton W, MacDermid J, Patterson S, Faber K, King G . Functional outcome of AO type C distal humeral fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2003; 28(2):294-308. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2003.50038. View

5.
Savvidou O, Zampeli F, Koutsouradis P, Chloros G, Kaspiris A, Sourmelis S . Complications of open reduction and internal fixation of distal humerus fractures. EFORT Open Rev. 2019; 3(10):558-567. PMC: 6335604. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180009. View