» Articles » PMID: 32499701

The Development of Practice Recommendations for Drug-Disease Interactions by Literature Review and Expert Opinion

Abstract

Background: Drug-disease interactions negatively affect the benefit/risk ratio of drugs for specific populations. In these conditions drugs should be avoided, adjusted, or accompanied by extra monitoring. The motivation for many drug-disease interactions in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) is sometimes insufficiently supported by (accessible) evidence. As a consequence the translation of SmPC to clinical practice may lead to non-specific recommendations. For the translation of this information to the real world, it is necessary to evaluate the available knowledge about drug-disease interactions, and to formulate specific recommendations for prescribers and pharmacists. The aim of this paper is to describe a standardized method how to develop practice recommendations for drug-disease interactions by literature review and expert opinion.

Methods: The development of recommendations for drug-disease interactions will follow a six-step plan involving a multidisciplinary expert panel (1). The scope of the drug-disease interaction will be specified by defining the disease and by describing relevant effects of this drug-disease interaction. Drugs possibly involved in this drug-disease interaction are selected by checking the official product information, literature, and expert opinion (2). Evidence will be collected from the official product information, guidelines, handbooks, and primary literature (3). Study characteristics and outcomes will be evaluated and presented in standardized reports, including preliminary conclusions on the clinical relevance and practice recommendations (4). The multidisciplinary expert panel will discuss the reports and will either adopt or adjust the conclusions (5). Practice recommendations will be integrated in clinical decision support systems and published (6). The results of the evaluated drug-disease interactions will remain up-to-date by screening new risk information, periodic literature review, and (re)assessments initiated by health care providers.

Actionable Recommendations: The practice recommendations will result in advices for specific DDSI. The content and considerations of these DDSIs will be published and implemented in all Clinical Decision Support Systems in the Netherlands.

Discussion: The recommendations result in professional guidance in the context of individual patient care. The professional will be supported in the decision making in concerning pharmacotherapy for the treatment of a medical problem, and the clinical risks of the proposed medication in combination with specific diseases.

Citing Articles

Physicians' and pharmacists' perspective on clarity and clinical relevance of absolute contraindications in "Summaries of Product Characteristics".

Andrikyan W, Sponfeldner M, Jung-Poppe L, Durr P, Straubmeier M, Schuster A Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024; 91(3):829-840.

PMID: 39511858 PMC: 11862801. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.16331.


A practical assessment protocol for clinically relevant P-glycoprotein-mediated drug-drug interactions.

Bogaard L, Tsoi K, van de Steeg B, Brandon E, Geers L, van Herwaarden M Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1412692.

PMID: 39403136 PMC: 11472019. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1412692.


Association of Drug-Disease Interactions with Mortality or Readmission in Hospitalised Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Inglis J, Caughey G, Thynne T, Brotherton K, Liew D, Mangoni A Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024; 11(3):345-360.

PMID: 38852118 PMC: 11365905. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00432-3.


Developing practical recommendations for drug-disease interactions in patients with hypertension.

Ozokcu K, Diesveld M, Gipmans S, Peeters L, van den Born B, Borgsteede S Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1360146.

PMID: 38694908 PMC: 11061388. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1360146.


Advancing Precision Medicine in Paediatrics: Past, present and future.

Elzagallaai A, Barker C, Lewis T, Cohn R, Rieder M Camb Prism Precis Med. 2024; 1:e11.

PMID: 38550924 PMC: 10953768. DOI: 10.1017/pcm.2022.14.


References
1.
Van Roon E, Flikweert S, le Comte M, Langendijk P, Kwee-Zuiderwijk W, Smits P . Clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions : a structured assessment procedure. Drug Saf. 2005; 28(12):1131-9. DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200528120-00007. View

2.
Heringa M, Floor-Schreudering A, Tromp P, De Smet P, Bouvy M . Nature and frequency of drug therapy alerts generated by clinical decision support in community pharmacy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015; 25(1):82-9. DOI: 10.1002/pds.3915. View

3.
Peters E, Hart P, Fraenkel L . Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions. Med Decis Making. 2010; 31(3):432-6. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10391672. View

4.
Duma N, Kothadia S, Azam T, Yadav S, Paludo J, Vera Aguilera J . Characterization of Comorbidities Limiting the Recruitment of Patients in Early Phase Clinical Trials. Oncologist. 2018; 24(1):96-102. PMC: 6324635. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0687. View

5.
Bingel U . Avoiding nocebo effects to optimize treatment outcome. JAMA. 2014; 312(7):693-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.8342. View