» Articles » PMID: 32493442

Impact of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Chronic Recurrent Pouchitis in Ulcerative Colitis with Ileo-anal Anastomosis: Study Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Almost 15% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require a proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) as a result of fulminant colitis, dysplasia, cancer, or medical refractory diseases. Around 50% will experience pouchitis, an idiopathic inflammatory condition involving the ileal reservoir, responsible for digestive symptoms, deterioration in quality of life, and disability. Though the majority of initial cases of pouchitis are easily managed with a short course of antibiotics, in about 10% of cases, inflammation of the pouch becomes chronic with very few treatments available. Previous studies have suggested that manipulating the composition of intestinal flora through antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics achieved significant results for treating acute episodes of UC-associated pouchitis. However, there is currently no established effective treatment for chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a novel therapy involving the transfer of normal intestinal flora from a healthy donor to a patient with a medical condition potentially caused by the disrupted homeostasis of intestinal microbiota or dysbiosis.

Methods: Our project aims to compare the delay of relapse of chronic recurrent pouchitis after FMT versus sham transplantation. Forty-two patients with active recurrent pouchitis after having undergone an IPAA for UC will be enrolled at 12 French centers. The patients who respond to antibiotherapy will be randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to receive either FMT or sham transplantation.

Discussion: On April 30, 2014, the World Health Organization published an alarming report on antibiotic resistance. Finding an alternative medical treatment to antibiotics in order to prevent relapses of pouchitis is therefore becoming increasingly important given the risk posed by multiresistant bacteria. Moreover, if the results of this study are conclusive, FMT, which is less expensive than biologics, could become a routine treatment in the future.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03524352. Registered on 14 May 2018.

Citing Articles

Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Chronic Pouchitis-A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Kahan T, Chandan S, Khan S, Deliwala S, Chang S, Axelrad J Gastro Hep Adv. 2024; 2(6):843-852.

PMID: 39130120 PMC: 11307912. DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2023.04.005.


Engraftment of essential functions through multiple fecal microbiota transplants in chronic antibiotic-resistant pouchitis-a case study using metatranscriptomics.

Deng Z, Pieper D, Stallmach A, Steube A, Vital M, Reck M Microbiome. 2023; 11(1):269.

PMID: 38037086 PMC: 10691019. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-023-01713-9.

References
1.
Machiels K, Sabino J, Vandermosten L, Joossens M, Arijs I, de Bruyn M . Specific members of the predominant gut microbiota predict pouchitis following colectomy and IPAA in UC. Gut. 2015; 66(1):79-88. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309398. View

2.
Shen B, Fazio V, Remzi F, Brzezinski A, Bennett A, Lopez R . Risk factors for diseases of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 4(1):81-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2005.10.004. View

3.
Imdad A, Nicholson M, Tanner-Smith E, Zackular J, Gomez-Duarte O, Beaulieu D . Fecal transplantation for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 11:CD012774. PMC: 6517295. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012774.pub2. View

4.
Nishida A, Imaeda H, Inatomi O, Bamba S, Sugimoto M, Andoh A . The efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for patients with chronic pouchitis: A case series. Clin Case Rep. 2019; 7(4):782-788. PMC: 6452488. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.2096. View

5.
Shen B . Acute and chronic pouchitis--pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 9(6):323-33. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.58. View