» Articles » PMID: 32492039

Preparedness Against Pandemic Influenza: Production of an Oil-in-water Emulsion Adjuvant in Brazil

Abstract

Increasing pandemic influenza vaccine manufacturing capacity is considered strategic by WHO. Adjuvant use is key in this strategy in order to spare the vaccine doses and by increasing immune protection. We describe here the production and stability studies of a squalene based oil-in-water emulsion, adjuvant IB160, and the immune response of the H7N9 vaccine combined with IB160. To qualify the production of IB160 we produced 10 consistency lots of IB160 and the average results were: pH 6.4±0.05; squalene 48.8±.0.03 mg/ml; osmolality 47.6±6.9 mmol/kg; Z-average 157±2 nm, with polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.085±0.024 and endotoxin levels <0.5 EU/mL. The emulsion particle size was stable for at least six months at 25°C and 24 months at 4-8°C. Two doses of H7N9 vaccine formulated at 7.5 μg/dose or 15 μg/dose with adjuvant IB160 showed a significant increase of hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers in sera of immunized BALB/c mice when compared to control sera from animals immunized with the H7N9 antigens without adjuvant. Thus the antigen-sparing capacity of IB160 can potentially increase the production of the H7N9 pandemic vaccine and represents an important achievement for preparedness against pandemic influenza and a successful North (IDRI) to South (Butantan Institute) technology transfer for the production of the adjuvant emulsion IB160.

Citing Articles

Vaccine targeting to mucosal lymphoid tissues promotes humoral immunity in the gastrointestinal tract.

Kocabiyik O, Amlashi P, Vo A, Suh H, Rodriguez-Aponte S, Dalvie N Sci Adv. 2024; 10(22):eadn7786.

PMID: 38809992 PMC: 11135404. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn7786.


Dose-sparing effect of two adjuvant formulations with a pandemic influenza A/H7N9 vaccine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial.

Vanni T, Thome B, Sparrow E, Friede M, Fox C, Beckmann A PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0274943.

PMID: 36256646 PMC: 9578608. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274943.


Better Pandemic Influenza Preparedness through Adjuvant Technology Transfer: Challenges and Lessons Learned.

Lemoine C, Nidom R, Ventura R, Indrasari S, Normalina I, Santoso K Vaccines (Basel). 2021; 9(5).

PMID: 34063131 PMC: 8148163. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9050461.

References
1.
Miyaki C, Quintilio W, Miyaji E, Botosso V, Kubrusly F, Santos F . Production of H5N1 (NIBRG-14) inactivated whole virus and split virion influenza vaccines and analysis of immunogenicity in mice using different adjuvant formulations. Vaccine. 2010; 28(13):2505-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.044. View

2.
Schultze V, DAgosto V, Wack A, Novicki D, Zorn J, Hennig R . Safety of MF59 adjuvant. Vaccine. 2008; 26(26):3209-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.093. View

3.
Martin J . Development of an adjuvant to enhance the immune response to influenza vaccine in the elderly. Biologicals. 1997; 25(2):209-13. DOI: 10.1006/biol.1997.0086. View

4.
Banzhoff A, Pellegrini M, Del Giudice G, Fragapane E, Groth N, Podda A . MF59-adjuvanted vaccines for seasonal and pandemic influenza prophylaxis. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009; 2(6):243-9. PMC: 4634121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2008.00059.x. View

5.
Scorza F . Advancing new vaccines against pandemic influenza in low-resource countries. Vaccine. 2017; 35(40):5397-5402. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.094. View