» Articles » PMID: 32490168

High-Precision Stereolithography of Biomicrofluidic Devices

Overview
Date 2020 Jun 4
PMID 32490168
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stereolithography (SL) is emerging as an attractive alternative to soft lithography for fabricating microfluidic devices due to its low cost and high design efficiency. Low molecular weight poly(ethylene glycol)diacrylate (MW = 258) (PEG-DA-258) has been used for SL 3D-printing of biocompatible microdevices at submillimeter resolution. However, 3D-printing resins that simultaneously feature high transparency, high biocompatibility, and high resolution are still lacking. It is found that photosensitizer isopropyl thioxanthone can, in a concentration-dependent manner, increase the absorbance of the resin (containing PEG-DA-258 and photoinitator Irgacure-819) by over an order of magnitude. This increase in absorbance allows for SL printing of microdevices at sub pixel resolution with commercially available desktop printers and without compromising transparency or biocompatibility. The assembly-free, rapid (<15 h) 3D-printing of a variety of complex 3D microfluidic devices such as a 3D-fluid router, a passive chaotic micro-mixer, an active micro-mixer with pneumatic microvalves, and high-aspect ratio (37:1) microchannels of single pixel width is demonstrated. These manufacturing capabilities are unavailable in conventional microfluidic rapid prototyping techniques. The low absorption of small hydrophobic molecules and microfluidic labeling of cultured mammalian cells in 3D-printed PEG-DA-258 microdevices is demonstrated, indicating the potential of PEG-DA-based fabrication of cell-based assays, drug discovery, and organ-on-chip platforms.

Citing Articles

From Soft Lithography to 3D Printing: Current Status and Future of Microfluidic Device Fabrication.

Xu J, Harasek M, Gfohler M Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40006117 PMC: 11859042. DOI: 10.3390/polym17040455.


Evaluation of 3D-Printed Microfluidic Structures for Use in AML-Specific Biomarker Detection of PML::RARA.

Emde B, Niehaus K, Tickenbrock L Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2.

PMID: 39859217 PMC: 11765455. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020497.


A 3D-printed multi-compartment organ-on-chip platform with a tubing-free pump models communication with the lymph node.

Cook S, Ball A, Mohammad A, Pompano R Lab Chip. 2024; 25(2):155-174.

PMID: 39661075 PMC: 11633827. DOI: 10.1039/d4lc00489b.


Towards a 3D-Printed Millifluidic Device for Investigating Cellular Processes.

Engelken J, Butelmann T, Tribukait-Riemenschneider F, Shastri V Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(11).

PMID: 39597157 PMC: 11596629. DOI: 10.3390/mi15111348.


3D polymerization (-3DP): Implementing an aqueous two-phase system for the formation of 3D objects inside a microfluidic channel.

Ramirez-Alvarado G, Garibaldi G, Toujani C, Sun G Biomicrofluidics. 2024; 18(5):054113.

PMID: 39464241 PMC: 11510685. DOI: 10.1063/5.0226620.


References
1.
Wang J, Douville N, Takayama S, Elsayed M . Quantitative analysis of molecular absorption into PDMS microfluidic channels. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012; 40(9):1862-73. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0562-z. View

2.
Yu L, Ng S, Xu Y, Dong H, Wang Y, Li C . Advances of lab-on-a-chip in isolation, detection and post-processing of circulating tumour cells. Lab Chip. 2013; 13(16):3163-82. DOI: 10.1039/c3lc00052d. View

3.
Lee Y, Bhattacharjee N, Folch A . 3D-printed Quake-style microvalves and micropumps. Lab Chip. 2018; 18(8):1207-1214. PMC: 7307877. DOI: 10.1039/C8LC00001H. View

4.
Waheed S, Cabot J, Macdonald N, Lewis T, Guijt R, Paull B . 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab Chip. 2016; 16(11):1993-2013. DOI: 10.1039/c6lc00284f. View

5.
Rogers C, Oxborrow J, Anderson R, Tsai L, Nordin G, Woolley A . Microfluidic Valves Made From Polymerized Polyethylene Glycol Diacrylate. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2013; 191. PMC: 3864702. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.10.008. View